AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Kintsugi · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Kintsugi

24Judge labels
2First choices
2Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Sales tax automation for small business buyers
Rank 10 of 37 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In sales tax automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kintsugi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Sales tax automationTax and compliance2%10 of 370%7under 10 labels · led by Avalara AvaTax at 32%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance0%71 of 1360%1under 10 labels · led by Avalara E-Invoicing at 25%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Kintsugi held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Sales tax automation · by segment

Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 7 → 8 of 32
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 13 → 9 of 36
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 → 19 of 44

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Sales tax automation0%2%▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 13 → 10 of 37
Global e-invoicing compl0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 71 of 136, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Kintsugi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase4 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TaxCloud and Kintsugi offer the most attractive pricing for basic compliance needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · first choice
“Other options include TaxJar and Kintsugi, which offer usage-based or free-tier plans.” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · alternative
“Kintsugi for fast-growing businesses needing flexible, integrated solutions” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Another free or low-cost option that focuses on sales tax compliance” Mistral Small · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kintsugi, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kintsugi was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
TaxCloud16 of 245Not among the top eight
TaxJar16 of 242Not among the top eight
Avalara AvaTax11 of 240Not among the top eight
Numeral10 of 241Not among the top eight
Anrok8 of 241Not among the top eight
Stripe Tax8 of 240Not among the top eight
Zamp8 of 240Not among the top eight
Vertex7 of 241Not among the top eight
Quaderno6 of 241Not among the top eight
Sovos5 of 240Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kintsugi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 24 answers that named Kintsugi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

taxcloud.com18
zamp.com18
trykintsugi.comYour site14
galvix.com11
taxjar.com9
taxwire.com8
avalara.com7
g2.com7
guideflow.com7
stripe.com7

Ninety-two of the 106 domain citations in answers naming Kintsugi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trykintsugi.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Kintsugi takes 2% of first choices and Avalara AvaTax takes 32%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sales tax tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “sales tax compliance software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“kintsugi”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
3,219 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 38,197 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,864 · 196 in the top three
Sites linking to it
845
Paid Google search
11 searches its ads show for, about 111 clicks and $1,359 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
108 ads · 62 text, 27 video, 19 image · 63 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2024, as Kintsugi AI, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 80 in the year, 28 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 37 in sales tax automation
Segment leader
32%
Avalara AvaTax
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
24 answers
Its own site cited
in 24 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on trykintsugi.com
1,112
subdomains included
Content
519
counted in the table below
Documentation
79
Product · Integration
14 · 47
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog322342026-09-29Sales tax automation, Accounting software
Template or tool7702026-05-06
Case study68232026-09-02Sales tax automation
Comparison2972026-09-26Sales tax automation
Glossary or explainer1822026-09-26Sales tax automation
Report or ebook512026-09-29

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trykintsugi.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Kintsugi

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Kintsugi is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Sales Tax Software: Monitor, Collect, File
For
For ecommerce, SaaS, and finance teams
Price stated
Flat-rate pricing, no lock-ins; Month-to-month, no per-transaction fees, implementation cost, or year-end overage. trykintsugi.com
Starting price
0 trykintsugi.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started for free trykintsugi.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IISOC2 Type II compliant
Hosting
100+ Countries
Customers named
Costco&CollarKavuru Group Holdings LLCJMXiPluflEngagedMDInspiredResultsKarma and Luck
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What Kintsugi's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trykintsugi.com, trykintsugi.com/pricing, trykintsugi.com/product/api, trykintsugi.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kintsugi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kintsugi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kintsugi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Kintsugi is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kintsugi, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trykintsugi.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.