AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Vendr · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Vendr

7Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Vendr was named 2 times in Contractor payments and 1 other category, where Tipalti led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Vendr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement0%60 of 980%1under 10 labels · led by Tipalti at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Strategic sourcingSpend and procurement0%102 of 1280%1under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Vendr held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Contractor payments · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 54 of 85, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Contractor payments0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 60 of 98, unchanged
Strategic sourcing0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 67 → 102 of 128

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Vendr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you use NetSuite or a heavy ERP: Look for specialized platforms like Vendr, Kantata, or Deel” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contractor payments · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vendr, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vendr was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Coupa5 of 70Not among the top eight
SAP Ariba4 of 70Not among the top eight
Precoro3 of 71Not among the top eight
Zip2 of 70Not among the top eight
Tinuvas1 of 71Not among the top eight
Tradogram1 of 71Not among the top eight
Adyen1 of 70Not among the top eight
Airbase1 of 70Not among the top eight
Arria Informatica1 of 70Not among the top eight
Brex1 of 70Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vendr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Vendr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brex.com2
precoro.com2
softwareconnect.com2
spendflo.com2
apsentra.com1
bill.com1
centerpointgroup.com1
coupa.com1
decryptiondigest.com1
deposco.com1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Vendr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

vendr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Vendr takes 0% of first choices and Tipalti takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “contractor payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “contractor payments and 1099 platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,600 a month (“vendr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
533 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 46,494 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,396 · 433 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,467
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as Vendr, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 60 of 98 in contractor payments
Segment leader
22%
Tipalti
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
7 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on vendr.com
4,494
subdomains included
Content
764
counted in the table below
Documentation
25
Product · Integration
3 · 2,729
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog61102026-06-01Procure-to-pay, Supplier management
Comparison6602026-03-16
Conference or event25undatedProcure-to-pay
Glossary or explainer2502024-12-31
Case study16undated
Webinar or virtual event11undated
Template or tool502025-01-03
News or press3undated
Report or ebook1undated
Podcast or video1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page vendr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name procure-to-pay (11); 2 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Vendr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Vendr is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The Authority on Software Pricing Transparency
For
finance and procurement teams
Price stated
free Price Checks vendr.com
Free plan or trial
Try for Free vendr.com
Certifications
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR CompliantSOC 1SOC 2ISO 27001SSAE 16/ISAE 3402PCI Level 1FISMA Moderate
Hosting
AWS US-EAST-1 (Virginia, USA)US-EAST-2 (Ohio, USA)AWS US-east region
Customers named
Root InsuranceFactorialNewtonXme&uThe AAClearscoreMuralRoot Inc.
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Vendr's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: vendr.com, vendr.com/pricing, vendr.com/legal/security, vendr.com/buyer-guides/platform-sh, vendr.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vendr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vendr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Vendr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Vendr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Vendr, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vendr.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.