AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Airtable · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

Airtable

17Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Airtable was named 3 times in Entity management and 2 other categories, where Athennian led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In entity management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Airtable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Entity managementEquity and corporate0%45 of 810%1under 10 labels · led by Athennian at 41%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Strategic sourcingSpend and procurement0%44 of 1280%1under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Supplier managementSpend and procurement0%42 of 1110%1under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 14%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Airtable held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Entity management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 78 of 94
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 → 43 of 79

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Entity management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 30 → 45 of 81
Strategic sourcing0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 44 of 128, unchanged
Supplier management0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 42 of 111, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Airtable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“building a portal via Softr and Airtable will give you a custom system for almost no cost” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · budget prompt · alternative
“These platforms allow you to build a custom "System of Record."” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Strategic sourcing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Airtable, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Airtable was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Notion6 of 170Not among the top eight
Diligent One Platform3 of 170Not among the top eight
Google Sheets3 of 170Not among the top eight
Monday.com3 of 170Not among the top eight
Smartsheet3 of 170Not among the top eight
Precoro2 of 171Not among the top eight
Ramp2 of 171Not among the top eight
Tradogram2 of 171Not among the top eight
Asana2 of 170Not among the top eight
Excel2 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Airtable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 17 answers that named Airtable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

itechguides.com3
worldmetrics.org3
zipdo.co3
airtable.comYour site2
fast.io2
gitnux.org2
learn.g2.com2
mindsprint.com2
ramp.com2
softwareadvice.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Airtable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

airtable.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Airtable takes 0% of first choices and Athennian takes 41%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “entity management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “legal entity management software”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“airtable”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,461 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 143,237 a month
Searches its site ranks for
11,937 · 1,354 in the top three
Sites linking to it
93,440
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
118+ ads · 118 text · 118 shown in the last 30 days

First shown June 2024, as FORMAGRID INC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 59 in the year, 59 before. 2 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 45 of 81 in entity management
Segment leader
41%
Athennian
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
17 answers
Its own site cited
in 9 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on airtable.com
10,106
subdomains included
Content
1,950
counted in the table below
Documentation
6,354
Product · Integration
74 · 226
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog70202025-09-29
News or press320undated
Template or tool310undated
Report or ebook164undated
Podcast or video125undated
Webinar or virtual event10642026-10-06
Case study77undated
Comparison64undated
Glossary or explainer49undated
Conference or event33undated

Most recent

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on airtable.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page airtable.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Airtable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Airtable; a claim can dispute any of them.
Softr + Airtable 1

Follow Airtable

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Airtable is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Build Enterprise-ready AI Workflows, Apps & Agents
For
teams
Price stated
Pricing airtable.com
Starting price
20 airtable.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started for free airtable.com
Integrations claimed
5 airtable.com
Certifications
ISOHIPAASOC 2SAML-based single sign-onHIPAA Compliance
Hosting
EuropeanAustralianEuropean data residency
Customers named
Code and TheoryWarner Music GroupRejuvenationWilliams-Sonoma CompanyFlatiron HealthButternut BoxDaily MailDMG Media

What Airtable's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: airtable.com, airtable.com/pricing, airtable.com/platform, airtable.com/customer-stories, airtable.com/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Airtable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Airtable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Airtable by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Airtable is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Airtable, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at airtable.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.