AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Astrella · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Astrella

13Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Cap table management for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 42 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cap table management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Astrella for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Cap table managementEquity and corporate2%10 of 420%2under 10 labels · led by Carta at 33%▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Astrella held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Cap table management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 → 19 of 47
Mid-market▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 11 → 9 of 39
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 14 of 48

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Cap table management2%2%▲+1Since September 2026: 2% → 2%, +1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 11 → 10 of 42

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Astrella across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labels1
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting with Astrella or Pulley” MiniMax M2.5 · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Enterprise-grade for later stages.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cap table management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Astrella, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Astrella was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Carta12 of 137Not among the top eight
Pulley11 of 132Not among the top eight
Ledgy9 of 131Not among the top eight
Shareworks8 of 134Not among the top eight
Qapita5 of 132Not among the top eight
Cake Equity4 of 130Not among the top eight
AngelList Stack3 of 130Not among the top eight
Eqvista3 of 130Not among the top eight
Morgan Stanley at Work3 of 130Not among the top eight
Capdesk2 of 130Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Astrella. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Astrella and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com10
resources.rework.com10
qapita.com8
valueaddvc.com8
cakeequity.com7
ctacquisitions.com7
astrella.comYour site6
carta.com6
zendikt.com6
sliceglobal.com5

Sixty-seven of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Astrella came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

astrella.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Astrella takes 2% of first choices and Carta takes 33%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “cap table platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “cap table management software”
5
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“astrella”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,511 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,088 · 17 in the top three
Sites linking to it
411
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 42 in cap table management
Segment leader
33%
Carta
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
13 answers
Its own site cited
in 13 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on astrella.com
243
subdomains included
Content
182
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog14402025-07-01Cap table management
Glossary or explainer21undated
Comparison11undated
Conference or event3undated
Report or ebook2undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page astrella.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Astrella

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Astrella is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Equity Management Software
For
Startups and growth companies
Price stated
Early Stage: 0-25 Stakeholders: $1,200 per year; Emerging: 26 - 100 Stakeholders: $3,200 per year; Accelerate: 101 - 300 Stakeholders: $8,200 per year; Custom: 300 Stakeholders and above: Contact us! astrella.com/pricing
Starting price
1200 astrella.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try Astrella free astrella.com
Certifications
ASC718 / IFRS
Customers named
Luxury Travel HackersDisaster Tech
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Astrella's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: astrella.com, astrella.com/pricing, astrella.com/products, astrella.com/category/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Astrella's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Astrella, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Astrella by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Astrella is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Astrella, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at astrella.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.