Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 12 → 9 of 46
Expensify · 1 category · RankedExpensify Travel
20Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate travel managem for small business buyers
Rank 41 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 67% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 49
0%13 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market41 of 61
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise49 of 49
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In corporate travel managem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Expensify Travel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 41 of 61 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Expensify Travel held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Corporate travel managem · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 27 → 39 of 57
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 → 46 of 46
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate travel managem | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 27 → 41 of 61 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Expensify Travel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Expensify Travel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best if your primary need is expense management with travel as an add-on.” MiniMax M2.5 · Corporate travel managem · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Better known for expense workflows than as a deep corporate travel program tool.” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Limited advanced booking/inventory vs. dedicated travel tools.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate travel managem · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Expensify Travel, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expensify Travel was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Expensify Travel, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Expensify Travel was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Expensify Travel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Expensify Travel and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
navan.com17
g2.com14
perk.com14
use.expensify.comYour site12
business.booking.com10
ottotheagent.com10
ramp.com10
bill.com9
oncehub.com9
learn.g2.com8
101 of the 113 domain citations in answers naming Expensify Travel came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
expensify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Expensify Travel takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.ShowHide
Search and answers
expensify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Expensify Travel takes 0% of first choices and Navan takes 53%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “travel management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “corporate travel booking platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“expensify travel”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Its company's site
- expensify.com shared with Expensify's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 76,291 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,060 · 493 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,441
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 41 of 61 in corporate travel managem
Segment leader
53%
Navan
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 19 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Expensify Travel
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Expensify Travel; a claim can dispute any of them.
Expensify 3
Follow Expensify Travel
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Expensify is the company behind Expensify Travel.ShowHide
The company
Expensify is the company behind Expensify Travel.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Book, manage, and reconcile all your business travel in one place.
- For
- both individuals and companies
- Price stated
- Get started for free; Members will pay a booking fee on a trip-by-trip basis. use.expensify.com/travel
- Free plan or trial
- Get started for free use.expensify.com/travel
- Hosting
- Global
- Customers named
- PreconBrooklyn NetsPrecon Events
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications
What Expensify Travel's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: use.expensify.com/travel, use.expensify.com/travel-expense-reimbursement, use.expensify.com/all-integrations/uber-for-business-expensify, use.expensify.com/resource-center/precon-expensify-travel-case-study, use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/corporate-t-and-e. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Expensify Travel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Expensify Travel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Expensify Travel by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Expensify Travel is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Expensify Travel, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.