Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 14 → 27 of 41
4 categories · Named, not rankedPleo
20Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Pleo was named 8 times in Expense management and 3 other categories, where Ramp led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business29 of 45
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 54
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 48
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In expense management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Pleo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 22 of 54 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 21 of 46 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Corporate cards | Spend and procurement | 0% | 49 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 52% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 42 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Pleo held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Expense management · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 12 → 19 of 46
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 22 of 54 |
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 21 of 46 |
| Corporate cards | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 49 of 67 |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 87, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Pleo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Pleo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“friendly UX, good for mid-size teams, strong in Europe” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · alternative
“SMBs wanting speed and simplicity benefit from Pleo” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Spend management platfor · comparative prompt · alternative
“Pleo (Best for Monthly Predictability)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pleo, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pleo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Pleo, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pleo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pleo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named Pleo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
bill.com8
g2.com8
ramp.com8
brex.com7
resources.rework.com7
emburse.com6
rho.co6
spendesk.com6
learn.g2.com5
precoro.com5
Sixty-six of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming Pleo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
pleo.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pleo takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
pleo.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Pleo takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “expense management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “expense management software”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“pleo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 162 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,593 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,251 · 23 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,372
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess1 ads · 1 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days
First shown October 2024, as Pleo Technologies A/S, verified.
On Google's pages: 1
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 22 of 54 in expense management
Segment leader
35%
Ramp
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on pleo.io
4,220
subdomains included
Content
1,133
counted in the table below
Documentation
351
Product · Integration
0 · 163
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 969 | 17 | 2026-09-17 | Expense management, Procure-to-pay | |
| Report or ebook | 80 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 51 | 0 | 2020-04-05 | ||
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-05-21 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2025-11-07 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Case study | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-17New in pleo say hello to the pleo mcp blog
- 2026-09-17New in pleo say hello to the pleo mcp blog
- 2026-09-15The real reason your ai investment isnt paying off blog
- 2026-09-09Pleos mcp is live blog
- 2026-09-09Pleos onboarding gave portalone a faster close and full spend visibility blog
- 2026-09-08Ai at pleo blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pleo.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Pleo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Pleo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Pleo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The business expenses solution that empowers your people to do more.
- For
- businesses
- Price stated
- Start: € 8 Per user / month; Build: € 14 Per user / month; Optimise: € 18 Per user / month pleo.io/at/pricing
- Starting price
- € 8 pleo.io/at/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try for free pleo.io/at/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 15 pleo.io
- Certifications
- PSD2PCI DSS CertificateAVGeen gereguleerde elektronischgeldinstelling, goedgekeurd door de Deense financiële toezichthouder
- Customers named
- PodimoDKBlinkistDESiliconNLPlandayTechspaceBataviastad Fashion OutletBudbeeSALT Amsterdam
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Pleo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: pleo.io, pleo.io/at/pricing, pleo.io/nl/security, pleo.io/nl/customers, pleo.io/nl/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pleo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pleo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Pleo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Pleo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Pleo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.