Every category where a model named Rillion for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Procure-to-pay	Spend and procurement	3%	6 of 87	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42%	▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Business bill pay	Treasury and cash	2%	14 of 98	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32%	=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	0%	18 of 54	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	28 of 94	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	39 of 83	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	0%	51 of 87	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 39%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Embedded payments platforms	Receivables and billing	0%	52 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Stripe Connect at 53%
Invoicing software	Receivables and billing	0%	38 of 71	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Invoice at 24%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Rillion held within the floor in all eight categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment

Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

4%from 0% in September 2026

Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 25 → 6 of 79

All categories · Mid-market

Category	September 2026	Now	Change	Reading	Rank
Procure-to-pay	0%	4%	▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 25 → 6 of 87
Business bill pay	2%	2%	=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 9 → 14 of 98
Accounts payable automat	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 19 → 18 of 54
B2B payment acceptance	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 35 → 28 of 94
Cash application	0%	0%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.	Within noise	Rank 65 → 39 of 83
Cross-border payments	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 51 of 87, unchanged
Embedded payments	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 52 of 110, unchanged
Invoicing software	0%	0%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.	New this edition	Rank 38 of 71, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Rillion across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	4	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2	4
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If I had to pick one default recommendation for a typical mid-sized B2B firm, I would choose Rillion” Perplexity Sonar · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Rillion - Built for mid-market companies that process a high volume of vendor payments” Llama 4 Maverick · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · first choice

“Procurify and Rillion are the best choices” Mistral Small · Procure-to-pay · direct prompt · first choice

“Rillion is built for mid-market companies that process a high volume of vendor payments” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Embedded payments · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rillion, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rillion was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tipalti11 of 230Not among the top eight

HighRadius8 of 230Not among the top eight

Stampli7 of 232Not among the top eight

AvidXchange5 of 232Not among the top eight

BILL5 of 232Not among the top eight

BILL Accounts Payable5 of 231Not among the top eight

BILL Accounts Receivable4 of 231Not among the top eight

Medius4 of 230Not among the top eight

Adyen3 of 231Not among the top eight

Procurify3 of 231Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rillion. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Rillion and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

rillion.comYour site21

highradius.com11

bill.com9

ramp.com6

g2.com5

mindsprint.com5

spendflo.com5

upflow.io5

payhawk.com4

procurify.com4

Fifty-four of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Rillion came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms9

rillion.com/blog/best-b2b-payment-automation8

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-b2b-payment-platforms6

rillion.com/blog/best-purchase-to-pay-software4

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software4

bill.com/blog/best-invoice-automation-software3

ebizcharge.com/blog/best-b2b-merchant-services-providers-in-20263

payhawk.com/en-us/blog/best-procurement-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

rillion.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Rillion takes 3% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “procurement platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “procure-to-pay platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 480 a month (“rillion”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 10 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 35,512 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,274 · 173 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,364
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 34 clicks and $576 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

33 ads · 21 text, 9 video, 3 image · 14 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2025, as Rillion AB, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 20 in the year, 13 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 6 of 87 in procure-to-pay

Segment leader

42%

Procurify

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 23 answers
Its own site cited: in 23 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on rillion.com

620

subdomains included

Content

287

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 18

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	169	6	2026-09-24	Accounts payable automat, ERP systems
Conference or event	29	undated
Case study	27	0	2026-01-16
Report or ebook	26	undated		Accounting software
Comparison	19	4	2026-09-25
Glossary or explainer	6	0	2025-12-04
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated
Template or tool	4	undated
News or press	2	2	2026-09-22

Most recent

2026-09-25Semine alternatives comparison
2026-09-25Ramp alternatives comparison
2026-09-24Custom po rules blog
2026-09-23Ai tools accounting and finance blog
2026-09-23Continia alternatives comparison
2026-09-22The CFO on AI: “Humans will always be the ones responsible” blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

May 13, 2026Happy Hour at DynamicsCon 2026The Tavern at Fontainebleau, Las Vegas, US · hosted

As the event pages on rillion.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page rillion.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Rillion

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rillion is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered AP automation that fits your needs
rillion.com
For: finance teams
rillion.com
Price stated: We offer pricing tailored to your needs and invoice volumes. rillion.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: We unfortunately cannot offer a trial period at this point. rillion.com/pricing
Integrations claimed: 6 rillion.com/pricing
Hosting: all over the globe
Customers named: USFarathaneRobinson LumberSmiles FirstMinimaniForenomAMF FastigheterHartelaVMG Construction Inc.
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, certifications

What Rillion's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: rillion.com, rillion.com/pricing, rillion.com/trust-center/security, rillion.com/customer-stories, rillion.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rillion's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rillion, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rillion by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rillion is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rillion, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.