Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 12 of 61
1 category · Named, not rankedTeampay
16Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Teampay was named 4 times in Procure-to-pay, where Procurify led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 69
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market21 of 87
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise52 of 52
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Teampay for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 21 of 87 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Teampay held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 9 → 18 of 79
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 47 of 47, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 21 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Teampay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Teampay across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best if you want an all-in-one spend management tool for mid-sized organizations” Perplexity Sonar · Procure-to-pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if your team is Slack-native and growing: Teampay” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Procure-to-pay · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Teampay is another budget-friendly option” Perplexity Sonar · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Distributed Teams” MiniMax M2.5 · Procure-to-pay · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teampay, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teampay was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teampay, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teampay was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teampay. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named Teampay and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com13
learn.g2.com13
precoro.com10
ramp.com8
spendflo.com8
procuredesk.com7
getapp.com6
mindsprint.com6
procurify.com6
bill.com5
Eighty-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Teampay came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
paystand.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teampay takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
paystand.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Teampay takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“teampay”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 59,075 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 9,871 · 412 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,427
- Paid Google search
- 16 searches its ads show for, about 1,789 clicks and $55,504 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 87 in procure-to-pay
Segment leader
42%
Procurify
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on paystand.com
764
subdomains included
Content
681
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 14
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 491 | 15 | 2026-09-18 | Cash application, Accounting software | |
| Report or ebook | 68 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | Expense management, ERP systems | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 36 | 0 | 2023-10-18 | ||
| Case study | 23 | 0 | 2021-07-07 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-08-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 1 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-05-28 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18How to reduce fx fees for businesses blog
- 2026-09-14How to pay international vendors blog
- 2026-09-11Labor is becoming digital blog
- 2026-09-10Meet the digital employees joining the paystand network blog
- 2026-09-09How to pay international contractors blog
- 2026-09-03Business financial management blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- October 9, 2026 to October 11, 2026Academy workshopsGaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, Nashville, United States
- October 11, 2026Preconference programsGaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, Nashville, United States
- October 12, 2026 to October 15, 2026Main All-Access conferenceGaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, Nashville, United States
- October 14, 2026Grand Ole Opry closing eventGaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, Nashville, United States
- October 15, 2026Public Sector DayGaylord Opryland Resort & Convention Center, Nashville, United States
As the event pages on paystand.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page paystand.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Teampay
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teampay's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teampay, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teampay by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Teampay is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teampay, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.