Financial reporting and dashboards for small business buyers
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
26%
Contested · Wave 17%
26QuickBooks Online17Wave17Xero40others
26% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.QuickBooks Online held the lead, −11 points on 38%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Sage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketSage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01QuickBooks Online26%22%55accepted challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.38% → 27%
QuickBooks Online26%22%55accepted challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.38% → 27%02
Xero17%5%38accepted challenger▲+16Since September 2026: 2% → 18%, +16 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 18%
Xero17%5%38accepted challenger▲+16Since September 2026: 2% → 18%, +16 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 18%03
Wave17%6%17accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 18%
Wave17%6%17accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 18%04
Fathom16%0%21accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 15% → 12%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 12%
Fathom16%0%21accepted challenger▼−3Since September 2026: 15% → 12%, −3 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 12%05
Zoho Books9%0%26accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 20% → 6%, −14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 6%
Zoho Books9%0%26accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 20% → 6%, −14 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.20% → 6%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Tableau0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Tableau0%76%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08Microsoft Power BI0%30%27criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
11Sage Intacct0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Sage Intacct0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Metabase0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Metabase0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Looker Studio Lab in the set0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Zoho Analytics0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Zoho Analytics0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Databox0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Databox0%0%10accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker Studio is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs Zoho AnalyticsSage Intacct vs TableauSage Intacct vs VenaWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs DatarailsWave vs Zoho AnalyticsWave vs TableauWave vs VenaZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs Zoho AnalyticsZoho Books vs TableauZoho Books vs VenaMicrosoft Power BI vs DatarailsMicrosoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs TableauMicrosoft Power BI vs VenaDatarails vs Zoho AnalyticsDatarails vs TableauDatarails vs VenaZoho Analytics vs TableauZoho Analytics vs VenaTableau vs Vena
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607M08
09101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01QuickBooks Online26%
QuickBooks Online26%02Xero17%
Xero17%03Wave17%
Wave17%04Fathom16%
Fathom16%05Zoho Books9%
Zoho Books9%06Looker Studio0%
Looker Studio0%07Zoho Analytics0%
Zoho Analytics0%08Microsoft Power BI0%
09Databox0%
Databox0%10Metabase0%
Metabase0%11Sage Intacct0%
Sage Intacct0%12Tableau0%
Tableau0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Tableau76%
13 of 17 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Tools to avoid or be cautious about - **Tableau** – Often cited as having a steep learning curve and high total cost of ownership” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
QuickBooks Online22%
12 of 55 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Complex Accounting/ERP Suites like QuickBooks Enterprise, Sage Intacct” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Microsoft Power BI
30%
8 of 27 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“require per‑user or per‑server fees that can run into thousands of dollars per year” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Looker67%
4 of 6 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Looker requires database developers to write LookML... If the person who built your LookML layer leaves the company, your reporting system effectively breaks.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1026 links across 301 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Ramp29 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Productive20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 25 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Drivetrain19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
18 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zoho18 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Maxio17 answers · 18 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · FreshBooks15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics15 answers · 15 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 7 models
15 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QuickBooks quickbooks.ninja QuickBooks Online 26% | 26% | 621 | 1,000,000 | 54,681 | 253 company | |||
| Xero xero.com | 17% | 737 | 90,500 | 4,610 | 1,200,289 | $500 | 119 | 2 |
| Wave waveapps.com | 17% | 323 | 368,000 | 253,218 | 708,862 | 39 | ||
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 16% | 204 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Books 9% | 9% | 326 | 27,100 | 268 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Syft syftanalytics.com Syft Analytics 7% | 7% | 34 | 1,900 | 85 | 1,190 | |||
| Clockwork clockwork.ai | 3% | 55 | 27,100 | 7,178 | 463 | 4 | ||
| Fathom Financial Reporting & Analytics | 2% | |||||||
| Flynote | 2% | |||||||
| Intuit QuickBooks intuit.com | 2% | 1 | 17,049,232 | $37,178 | 109 | 8 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (productive.io, quickbooks.intuit.com, ramp.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top reporting tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Intuit QuickBooks, XeroFathomChangedZoho Analyticsagainst: TableauWaveno first choiceagainst: Corporater, Google Sheets, JasperReports, Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
Datarails, FathomThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksFour alternatives
Google Analytics, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks OnlineTwo alternatives
Quicken Business & Personal, XeroGPT-5.4 miniXeroXeroHeldZoho Analyticsagainst: TableauXerono first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
G-Accon, QuickBooks OnlineFour alternatives
Looker, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Power BIOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineGemini 3.5 FlashFathom, Syft AnalyticsClockworkChangedLooker Studioagainst: Microsoft Power BISyft Analytics, Waveagainst: Cube, Datarails, JiravClockwork, Syft Analyticsagainst: Anaplan, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, Google Sheets, Looker, Metabase, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Redash, SAS Business Intelligence, Tableau
Four alternatives
Jirav, QuickBooks Online, Rillet, XeroFour alternatives
Baremetrics, ChartMogul, Dryrun, FathomSeven alternatives
AgencyAnalytics, Ajelix, ClickUp, Databox, Metabase, Monday.com, Teamwork.comFive alternatives
Fathom, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Tiller Money, Zoho BooksFive alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Jirav, LiveFlow, RunwayPerplexity SonarQuickBooks OnlineFathomChangedDatabox, Looker Studio, Zoho Analyticsagainst: Microsoft Power BIWaveagainst: QuickBooks Online, Xerono first choiceagainst: Improvado, Looker Studio, QuickBooks Online
Four alternatives
Datarails, Sage Intacct, Xero, Zoho BooksTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Fathom, LivePlanOne alternative
Zoho BooksGrok 4.1 FastQuickBooks Onlineagainst: Sage IntacctQuickBooks OnlineHeldLooker Studioagainst: ClickUp, Monday.com, TableauWaveno first choiceagainst: Domo, Looker, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, QuickBooks Online, SAP, Sage Intacct, Tableau, Workiva
Two alternatives
FreshBooks, XeroThree alternatives
Fathom, Xero, Zoho BooksFour alternatives
Databox, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksMistral SmallQuickBooks Online, XeroFathomChangedno first choiceWave, Zoho Booksagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choiceagainst: QuickBooks Online
One alternative
Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks OnlineOne alternative
XeroDeepSeek V4 FlashQuickBooks Online, XeroFathomChangedLooker Studio, Metabaseagainst: TableauWaveagainst: QuickBooks OnlineSyft Analyticsagainst: Domo, Excel/Google Sheets, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Qlik Sense, Tableau
Three alternatives
FreshBooks, Sage Intacct, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Float, QuickBooks Online, UpflowTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Xero, Zoho BooksSeven alternatives
Cube, Datarails, Planful, QuickBooks Online, Vena, Xero, Zoho BooksLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFathom Financial Reporting & AnalyticsChangedLivePlanZoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Funnel, Improvado, QuickBooks Online
Two alternatives
Databox, Looker StudioThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, XeroQwen 3.7 FlashQuickBooks OnlineFathom, FlynoteChangedLooker StudioWaveno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, SAP, Xeroagainst: Excel/Google Sheets, Google Ads, LinkedIn Campaign Manager, Meta Ads Manager, OneSource Intacct, Oracle, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, SAP Business One
Four alternatives
HubiFi, Oracle NetSuite, Productive, YouniumFour alternatives
BILL, Chaser, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Metabase, Microsoft Power BI, TableauThree alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Xero, Zoho BooksKimi K2QuickBooks OnlineQuickBooks Online, XeroChangedLooker StudioWaveno first choiceagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau
Three alternatives
Maxio, Sage Intacct, XeroThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, WaveThree alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Zoho AnalyticsTwo alternatives
Xero, Zoho BooksGLM 4.7 FlashXQuickBooks Online, Xeroagainst: Oracle NetSuiteQuickBooks OnlineChangedMicrosoft Power BIQuickBooks Online, Zoho Booksagainst: Waveno first choiceagainst: Looker, MYOB, QuickBooks Online, Sage, Tableau
Two alternatives
Sage Intacct, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Fathom, Invoice Ninja, Zoho AnalyticsFour alternatives
ClickUp, Geckoboard, Klipfolio, Looker StudioTwo alternatives
Sage Business Accounting, XeroMiniMax M2.5QuickBooks Online, XeroQuickBooks OnlineChangedLooker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Zoho AnalyticsWaveno first choiceagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Analytics, SAP Business Objects, Tableau
Two alternatives
FreshBooks, WaveThree alternatives
BILL, Fathom Financial Analytics, Zoho BooksThree alternatives
Databox, Monday.com, TableauTwo alternatives
QuickBooks Online, Zoho BooksGPT-6 LunaFathom, QuickBooks OnlineFathomChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: TableauZoho Booksno first choicenothing named
One alternative
XeroTwo alternatives
Float, QuickBooks OnlineThree alternatives
Looker Studio, Metabase, Zoho AnalyticsOne alternative
WaveMuse Glimmer 30BQuickBooks Online, XeroFathomChangedLooker Studio, Zoho AnalyticsWave, Zoho Booksno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power BI, Tableauagainst: Intacct, Microsoft Power BI, QuickBooks Online, Ramp, Tableau
One alternative
FathomFour alternatives
Maxio, QuickBooks Online, Syft Analytics, UpflowFour alternatives
DashThis, Databox, Metabase, QuickBooks OnlineOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineFour alternatives
FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online, Syft Analytics, XeroBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 27 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 23 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 25 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 17 | 209 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:17 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 17 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 25 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 20 | 72 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 18 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:55 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 24 | 131 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 22 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:44 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 22 | 81 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:31 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 24 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:19 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 16 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:18 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:24 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:03 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 23 | 105 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 9 | 50 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bill.com read as BILL
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Free read as QuickBooks Online
QuickBooks Solopreneur read as QuickBooks Online
Wave Accounting read as Wave
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Ajelix
BiClaw
CloudZero
Corporater
Databooks
Fathom Financial Analytics
Fathom Financial Reporting & Analytics
Flynote
Flywheel
Glew
Google Ads
LinkedIn Campaign Manager
Luzmo
Meta Ads Manager
Metabase Cloud
OneSource Intacct
Polar Analytics
SAP Business Objects
SAS Business Intelligence
SegmentStream
SlickPie
Tiller Money
eOne Solutions
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.