Financial reporting and dashboards for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial reporting software”, and as “finance dashboard tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 46 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · OneStream 11%
22Microsoft Power BI11OneStream09Oracle NetSuite59others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Microsoft Power BI held the lead, −1 point on 19%, inside the 10-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Sage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
QuickBooks Online26%Contested▼−11Since September 2026: 38% → 27%, −11 points. Past the 10-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketSage Intacct33%Contested▲+9Since September 2026: 27% → 36%, +9 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseMicrosoft Power BI22%Contested▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Power BI22%13%45accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 19% → 18%, −1 point. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 18%
02
OneStream11%5%21accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 10%
OneStream11%5%21accepted challenger▼−7Since September 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.17% → 10%03
Workday Adaptive Planning9%10%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 9% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 10%
Workday Adaptive Planning9%10%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 9% → 10%, +2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 10%04
Workiva9%15%20accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%
Workiva9%15%20accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 10%05
Oracle NetSuite9%23%13accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 10%
Oracle NetSuite9%23%13accepted challenger▲+8Since September 2026: 2% → 10%, +8 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 10%06
SAP Analytics Cloud7%15%20accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%
SAP Analytics Cloud7%15%20accepted challenger▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 8%07
Anaplan2%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%
Anaplan2%20%20accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 3%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 3%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14SQL Server Reporting Services0%70%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
13
IBM Cognos Analytics0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM Cognos Analytics0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
Tableau0%21%34accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Tableau0%21%34accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%12
Domo0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Domo0%20%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
Looker Lab in the set0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Looker Lab in the set0%14%22accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Oracle Analytics0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Oracle Analytics0%8%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
Qlik Sense0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Qlik Sense0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Looker is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Sage Intacct vs DatarailsSage Intacct vs Zoho AnalyticsSage Intacct vs TableauSage Intacct vs VenaWave vs Zoho BooksWave vs Microsoft Power BIWave vs DatarailsWave vs Zoho AnalyticsWave vs TableauWave vs VenaZoho Books vs Microsoft Power BIZoho Books vs DatarailsZoho Books vs Zoho AnalyticsZoho Books vs TableauZoho Books vs VenaMicrosoft Power BI vs DatarailsMicrosoft Power BI vs Zoho AnalyticsMicrosoft Power BI vs TableauMicrosoft Power BI vs VenaDatarails vs Zoho AnalyticsDatarails vs TableauDatarails vs VenaZoho Analytics vs TableauZoho Analytics vs VenaTableau vs Vena
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
020304050607080910111213S14
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Power BI22%
02OneStream11%
OneStream11%03Workday Adaptive Planning9%
Workday Adaptive Planning9%04Workiva9%
Workiva9%05Oracle NetSuite9%
Oracle NetSuite9%06SAP Analytics Cloud7%
SAP Analytics Cloud7%07Anaplan2%
Anaplan2%08Tableau0%
Tableau0%09Qlik Sense0%
Qlik Sense0%10Looker0%
Looker0%11Oracle Analytics0%
Oracle Analytics0%12Domo0%
Domo0%13IBM Cognos Analytics0%
IBM Cognos Analytics0%14SQL Server Reporting Services0%
What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Sheets100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“"Spreadsheet-Based Reporting (Excel/Google Sheets) … consistently warns against relying on spreadsheets at enterprise scale"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
SQL Server Reporting Services
70%
7 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“"SSRS gets no new versions after SQL Server 2025" — "Continued investment in those stacks leaves enterprises without new features/support."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
6 of 6 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Spreadsheet-Heavy Environments (Excel/Google Sheets) ... relying on them as a core infrastructure for enterprise reporting is a major anti-pattern.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Microsoft Power BI
13%
6 of 45 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Premium licensing cliffs (e.g., Power BI Premium, Tableau Prep...) | • Hidden costs can balloon into $250K+ sunk‑cost failures” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1100 links across 363 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
25 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Basedash23 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics19 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HighRadius19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Drivetrain17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Datarails15 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Ramp14 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Guideflow14 answers · 14 citations · 11 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Maxio12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
24 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 8 models
9 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial reporting software”, “financial reporting software”, “reporting tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Power BI | 22% | 14,800 | 515 | ||||
| OneStream onestream.com | 11% | 478 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 |
| Acumatica acumatica.com Acumatica 7%, Acumatica Cloud ERP 4% | 11% | 132 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 | $2,934 | 120 |
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 9% | 9% | 407 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 | |
| Workiva workiva.com | 9% | 596 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 |
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 9%, Oracle Analytics 0% | 9% | 489 | 450,000 | 66,611 | |||
| SAP sap.com SAP Analytics Cloud 7%, SAP 2%, SAP S/4HANA 0% | 9% | 178 | 135,000 | 74,309 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 |
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 4% | 4% | 433 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 4% | 4% | 273 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 |
| Anaplan anaplan.com | 2% | 491 | 18,100 | 532 | 78,179 | 31 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (highradius.com, kanerika.com, ramp.com). The first result for “best financial reporting software” is thecfoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial reporting software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which finance dashboard tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reporting tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial reporting software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial reporting software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reporting tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5WorkivaAnaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningChangedMicrosoft Power BIAcumaticano first choiceagainst: Board, Google Sheets, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, Microsoft PowerPoint, SQL Server Reporting Services
One alternative
MaxioTwo alternatives
FineBI, OneStreamFour alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Oracle Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauTwo alternatives
Anaplan, WorkivaGPT-5.4 miniWorkivaWorkday Adaptive PlanningChangedMicrosoft Power BIOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: SAP, SAP BPCno first choiceagainst: Looker
Four alternatives
Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
Anaplan, DatarailsSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, MicroStrategy, Oracle Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauOne alternative
WorkivaGemini 3.5 FlashPigmentagainst: AnaplanMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: AnaplanMicrosoft Power BIagainst: IBM Cognos Analytics, SAP Analytics CloudMicrosoft Power BI via Microsoft Fabric Capacityagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Excel, Oracle Analytics, Redash, SAP BusinessObjects, Tableau
Five alternatives
Maxio, OneStream, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaFive alternatives
Acterys, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning, Zebra BIFive alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, Sigma Computing, Tableau, ThoughtSpotThree alternatives
Acumatica, OneStream, WorkivaPerplexity SonarWorkday Adaptive PlanningMicrosoft Power BIChangedno first choiceSAPno first choiceagainst: Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, SAP Analytics Cloud
Four alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP, WorkivaFour alternatives
Looker, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, TableauOne alternative
WorkivaGrok 4.1 FastOneStreamMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIAcumaticaagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacctno first choiceagainst: Apache Superset, Domo, IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Oracle BI Publisher / Oracle Analytics, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Four alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Looker, TableauFour alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Qlik Sense, TableauFive alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial Management, WorkivaMistral SmallOneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningSAP Analytics CloudChangedMicrosoft Power BIAcumatica Cloud ERPagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365, Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctWorkivaagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.3, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Vena, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Sigma Computing, Zoho AnalyticsFive alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, OneStreamFour alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, Workday Adaptive PlanningDeepSeek V4 FlashOracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctMicrosoft Power BIChangedagainst: TableauMicrosoft Power BIagainst: SAP BusinessObjectsMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Workivano first choiceagainst: Domo, Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, Microsoft SSRS, Oracle OBIEE, QlikView, Quick BI, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BusinessObjects, Swydo, Tableau, TapClicks, Zoho Analytics
Three alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Anaplan, Oracle Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, Sigma ComputingFive alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, MicroStrategy, Qlik Sense, TableauOne alternative
OneStreamLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashBlackLineSAP Analytics CloudChangedMicrosoft Power BIagainst: SASOneStream, Workivano first choiceagainst: Qlik Sense, Tableauagainst: Google Sheets, IBM Cognos Analytics, Jaspersoft, Looker Studio (formerly Google Data Studio) Free Tier, Metabase, MicroStrategy, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI Desktop, Pentaho Community Edition, Tableau Personal Pro
Six alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, OneStream, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, VenaTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power BI, Sigma ComputingFour alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, TableauThree alternatives
Fathom, HighRadius, JoiinKimi K2Oracle NetSuiteOneStreamChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Anaplan, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Facebook Insights, Google Analytics, Looker, Looker Studio, Microsoft Power BI, SAP BusinessObjects, SAP Crystal Reports, Tableau
Six alternatives
FloQast, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Planful, SAP S/4HANA, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Datarails, IBM Cognos Analytics, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Group ReportingGLM 4.7 FlashXOracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctSAP Analytics CloudChangedno first choiceAcumaticaagainst: Fathom, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, Workivano first choiceagainst: BusinessObjects BI 4.3, Google Sheets, Looker Studio, Metabase, Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Power BI, SQL Server Reporting Services, Tableau Prep
Three alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Anaplan, Datarails, Microsoft Power BIThree alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANAMiniMax M2.5Oracle NetSuiteMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BI, TableauAcumatica Cloud ERPno first choiceagainst: Funnel, Improvado, SAP BusinessObjects BI 4.3, SQL Server Reporting Services
Four alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANA, Sage IntacctFour alternatives
Domo, Looker, Qlik Sense, TableauThree alternatives
Looker, Qlik Sense, SisenseThree alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, SAP S/4HANA, Workday Financial ManagementGPT-6 LunaOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Power BIagainst: Workivano first choiceagainst: Access, Lumira Discovery, Oracle OTBI, SAP Crystal Reports, SQL Server Reporting Services
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planning, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Tableau, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Oracle Analytics, Tableau, ThoughtSpotOne alternative
OneStreamMuse Glimmer 30BDrivetrainMicrosoft Power BIChangedMicrosoft Power BIMicrosoft Fabric / Power BI Premiumagainst: Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: BusinessObjects BI 4.3, Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, SQL Server Reporting Services
Three alternatives
Anaplan, Microsoft Power BI, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Looker, SAP Group Reporting, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, TableauSix alternatives
IBM Cognos Analytics, Looker, Google Cloud, Oracle Analytics, Qlik Sense, SAP Analytics Cloud, Tableau, SalesforceOne alternative
JoiinBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:45 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 21 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:48 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 12 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 24 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 24 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 19 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:08 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 20 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:44 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 14 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:05 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:49 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:40 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 7 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 16 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 12 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:11 | yes | 19 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 20 | 55 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:56 | yes | 19 | 64 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 4 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:27 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:48 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 25 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:54 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:34 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:33 | yes | 22 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:38 | no | 0 | 62 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:07 | yes | 6 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 18 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 24 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:52 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 17 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Google Looker Studio read as Looker Studio
IBM Cognos read as IBM Cognos Analytics
IBM Cognos (legacy versions) read as IBM Cognos Analytics
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
NetSuite (Oracle NetSuite) read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud ERP read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM (Enterprise Performance Management) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Qlik read as Qlik Sense
Qlik (Qlik Sense) read as Qlik Sense
Qlik Cloud Analytics / Qlik Sense read as Qlik Sense
SAP S/4HANA Finance read as SAP S/4HANA
Sigma read as Sigma Computing
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Workday Adaptive read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Unresolved, counted raw
Access
Excel-style reporting
Facebook Insights
Insight Software
Looker Studio (formerly Google Data Studio) Free Tier
Looker, Google Cloud
Lumira Discovery
Microsoft Fabric / Power BI Premium
Microsoft Power BI Desktop
Oracle Analytics Publisher
Oracle BI Publisher / Oracle Analytics (legacy versions)
Oracle OBIEE
Oracle OTBI
Pentaho Community Edition
Prophet
QlikView
Quick BI (Alibaba Cloud)
Sublytics
Swydo
Tableau Personal Pro
Tableau Prep
Tableau, Salesforce
Zebra BI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.