Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 22 of 60, unchanged
BILL · 2 categories · Named, not rankedBILL AP/AR
10Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. BILL AP/AR was named 3 times in Business bill pay and 1 other category, where BILL led with 32%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 66
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market11 of 98
2%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprise52 of 76
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In business bill pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named BILL AP/AR for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 2% | 11 of 98 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 0% | 26 of 94 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 19% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, BILL AP/AR held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Business bill pay · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 of 89, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 51 of 74, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business bill pay | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 11 of 98, unchanged |
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 26 of 94 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated BILL AP/AR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated BILL AP/AR across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase7 labels3
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“best all-around choice if you want a straightforward AP/vendor payments tool... Most mid-sized B2B companies: BILL” GPT-5.4 mini · Business bill pay · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Fast time-to-value SMB / lower mid-market: BILL AP/AR is a widely adopted accounts payable and receivable platform” Muse Glimmer 30B · B2B payment acceptance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“BILL AP/AR is a strong option for midsize teams” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B payment acceptance · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL AP/AR, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL AP/AR was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as BILL AP/AR, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and BILL AP/AR was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named BILL AP/AR. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 10 answers that named BILL AP/AR and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
learn.g2.com7
g2.com4
eco.com3
netsuite.com3
ramp.com3
bill.comYour site2
chaserhq.com2
corpay.com2
f6s.com2
fitsmallbusiness.com2
Twenty-eight of the thirty domain citations in answers naming BILL AP/AR came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
bill.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BILL AP/AR takes 2% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.ShowHide
Search and answers
bill.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, BILL AP/AR takes 2% of first choices and BILL takes 32%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “bill pay platforms”
1
Position for “bill pay platform for businesses”
1
- Its company's site
- bill.com shared with BILL's other products; the figures are the site's
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,783,039 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 72,278 · 6,684 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,288
- Paid Google search
- 45 searches its ads show for, about 5,920 clicks and $199,231 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 98 in business bill pay
Segment leader
32%
BILL
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 10 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow BILL AP/AR
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL AP/AR.ShowHide
The company
BILL is the company behind BILL AP/AR.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Learn how to identify ideal prospects for AP/AR services and gain their interest.
- For
- Accountants and firms selling AP/AR services to small and medium businesses
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What BILL AP/AR's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: bill.com/accountant-resource-center/articles/tips-and-tricks-to-sell-bill-ap-ar, bill.com/accountant-resource-center/downloads/best-practices-for-implementing-bill-ap-ar-at-your-firm. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when BILL AP/AR's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as BILL AP/AR, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for BILL AP/AR by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where BILL AP/AR is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name BILL AP/AR, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.