AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Fyle · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Fyle

8Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fyle was named 3 times in Expense management, where Ramp led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In expense management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fyle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Expense managementSpend and procurement0%18 of 540%3under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Fyle held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Expense management · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 16 → 11 of 41
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 18 → 16 of 46
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Expense management0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 18 of 54, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Fyle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Modern alternatives like Ramp, Zoho Expense, or Fyle are generally rated highly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · negative prompt · alternative
“choose Fyle or Expensify” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fyle, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fyle was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SAP Concur8 of 80Not among the top eight
Ramp7 of 84Not among the top eight
Brex7 of 81Not among the top eight
Expensify7 of 81Not among the top eight
BILL Spend & Expense7 of 80Not among the top eight
Zoho Expense5 of 80Not among the top eight
Coupa Expense Management2 of 80Not among the top eight
Emburse2 of 80Not among the top eight
Mesh Payments2 of 80Not among the top eight
Navan2 of 80Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fyle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Fyle and are not a share of its labels.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on fylehq.com
3,199
subdomains included
Content
1,954
counted in the table below
Documentation
254
Product · Integration
20 · 8
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,53002024-01-03Expense management, Accounting software
Template or tool252undated
Comparison5002025-12-10Expense management
Glossary or explainer4502025-09-04Expense management
Case study34undatedExpense management
Webinar or virtual event19undated
Conference or event1202025-07-22
Report or ebook1002023-03-15Expense management
News or press202025-06-10

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page fylehq.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Fyle

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Fyle is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The best expense tracker & credit card expense management software for small businesses and mid-market.
For
small businesses and mid-market
Price stated
Usage-led pricing fylehq.com/pricing
Starting price
11.99 fylehq.com/pricing
Certifications
GDPRSOC 2 Type 1 & Type 2PCI DSSSOC2 Type 1Type 2SOC 2 Type 1 & Type 2 CompliantGDPR Compliant for data privacyPCI DSS Level 1 Certified
Customers named
WesthavenTASABluegrass Health PartnerBright Futures for YouthBluegrassTexas Association of School AdministratorsRiverbend DevelopmentTomtreyco
Not stated on the pages read
Free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Fyle's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: fylehq.com, fylehq.com/pricing, fylehq.com/product/security, fylehq.com/product/cards, fylehq.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fyle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fyle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Fyle by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Fyle is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Fyle, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fylehq.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.