Mid-market▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 31 → 10 of 84
4 categories · RankedMineralTree
30Judge labels
3First choices
2Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in B2B payment acceptance for mid-market buyers
Rank 10 of 94 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of MineralTree →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market10 of 94
4%12 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise72 of 105
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In b2b payment acceptance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named MineralTree for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | Receivables and billing | 4% | 10 of 94 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Accounts payable automation | Spend and procurement | 2% | 14 of 54 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Business bill pay | Treasury and cash | 0% | 33 of 98 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by BILL at 32% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cash application | Receivables and billing | 0% | 49 of 83 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Versapay at 9% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, MineralTree held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · B2B payment acceptance · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 35 → 63 of 89
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B payment acceptance | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 10 of 94 |
| Business bill pay | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 33 of 98 |
| Accounts payable automat | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 14 of 54 |
| Cash application | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 49 of 83, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated MineralTree across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated MineralTree across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels3
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“MineralTree is a great accounts payable solution for mid-market or enterprise organisations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · first choice
“For a typical mid-market B2B company, I'd recommend starting with MineralTree” Kimi K2 · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · first choice
“I would start with MineralTree for most mid-market B2B teams” Perplexity Sonar · B2B payment acceptance · direct prompt · first choice
“MineralTree is a strong fit if your company is more focused on B2B AP and payment operations across multiple systems” Perplexity Sonar · Cash application · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some G2 reviewers report integration sync issues with NetSuite and Dynamics GP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Accounts payable automat · direct prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MineralTree, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MineralTree was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as MineralTree, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MineralTree was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MineralTree. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 30 answers that named MineralTree and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
highradius.com19
theretailexec.com13
g2.com9
bill.com8
rillion.com8
gitnux.org7
medius.com7
stampli.com7
wise.com7
worldmetrics.org7
Ninety-two of the ninety-two domain citations in answers naming MineralTree came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
mineraltree.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MineralTree takes 4% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.ShowHide
Search and answers
mineraltree.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, MineralTree takes 4% of first choices and Versapay takes 19%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b payment platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “b2b payment acceptance platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“mineraltree”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,195 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,798 · 70 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,412
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 10 of 94 in B2B payment acceptance
Segment leader
19%
Versapay
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 30 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 27 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on mineraltree.com
665
subdomains included
Content
596
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
14 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 350 | 13 | 2026-09-23 | Accounts payable automat, Corporate cards | |
| Report or ebook | 58 | 1 | 2026-08-17 | Accounts payable automat | |
| News or press | 57 | 0 | 2025-06-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 46 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | Corporate cards, Accounts payable automat | |
| Podcast or video | 30 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | ||
| Case study | 26 | 0 | 2026-04-17 | ||
| Comparison | 12 | 0 | 2025-12-18 | Accounts payable automat | |
| Glossary or explainer | 9 | 0 | 2026-05-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 6 | 0 | 2021-08-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-02-11 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Vendor payment methods explained blog
- 2026-09-15Modernizing your ap process doesnt require replacing your erp webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-08Infographics blog
- 2026-09-08Payment performance framework for finance teams blog
- 2026-09-03Payment processing costs blog
- 2026-08-31Sage intacct vendor payments solution blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page mineraltree.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as MineralTree
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MineralTree; a claim can dispute any of them.
MineralTree (TotalAP) 1
Follow MineralTree
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
MineralTree is its own company.ShowHide
The company
MineralTree is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- MineralTree's accounts payable (AP) automation software integrates with your ERP to increase efficiency and reduce fraud risk.
- For
- finance teams; mid-market to global enterprise
- Customers named
- The Baltimore RavensEO ProductsLadera WineryHealth ProgramsSimple MillsOlympia HospitalityPaytronixHealthcare Practice Management Company
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting
What MineralTree's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: mineraltree.com, mineraltree.com/solutions, mineraltree.com/resources/case-studies, mineraltree.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MineralTree's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MineralTree, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for MineralTree by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where MineralTree is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name MineralTree, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.