Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 20 → 13 of 61
1 category · Named, not rankedProcurementExpress.com
15Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ProcurementExpress.com was named 2 times in Procure-to-pay, where Procurify led with 42%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business16 of 69
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market30 of 87
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In procure-to-pay · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named ProcurementExpress.com for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 30 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, ProcurementExpress.com held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Procure-to-pay · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 52 → 29 of 79
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 52 → 30 of 87 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated ProcurementExpress.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated ProcurementExpress.com across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“ratings >4.5 (e.g., top ones like ProcurementExpress.com at 4.7)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcurementExpress.com, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcurementExpress.com was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as ProcurementExpress.com, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProcurementExpress.com was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProcurementExpress.com. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 15 answers that named ProcurementExpress.com and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
procuredesk.com9
softwareadvice.com9
spendflo.com9
g2.com8
ramp.com8
capterra.com7
mindsprint.com6
softwareconnect.com6
tradogram.com6
wise.com6
Seventy-four of the seventy-four domain citations in answers naming ProcurementExpress.com came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
procurementexpress.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ProcurementExpress.com takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.ShowHide
Search and answers
procurementexpress.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ProcurementExpress.com takes 0% of first choices and Procurify takes 42%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “procurement platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “procure-to-pay platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“procurementexpress.com”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,050 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 873 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 593
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 30 of 87 in procure-to-pay
Segment leader
42%
Procurify
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 15 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on procurementexpress.com
283
subdomains included
Content
96
counted in the table below
Documentation
130
Product · Integration
11 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 41 | 0 | 2025-06-23 | ||
| Case study | 28 | 0 | 2025-12-15 | Corporate cards | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2022-04-25 | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 5 | 0 | 2026-02-05 | ||
| Comparison | 3 | 0 | 2025-05-07 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2022-09-27 |
Most recent
- 2026-02-05Lindsay webber what makes someone perfect for audit work podcast or video
- 2026-02-02Stephen newland travel debt freedom building a fractional cfo business podcast or video
- 2026-01-29Anna tiomina ai finance revolution how cfos are saving 75 of their time podcast or video
- 2025-12-15Addressing complex construction procurement challenges case study
- 2025-11-10Case study how a growing recycling company transformed remote team procurement case study
- 2025-10-30Biotech company streamlines research procurement after workforce reduction case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page procurementexpress.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as ProcurementExpress.com
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ProcurementExpress.com; a claim can dispute any of them.
ProcurementExpress / Spendwise 1
Follow ProcurementExpress.com
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
ProcurementExpress.com is its own company.ShowHide
The company
ProcurementExpress.com is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered audit readiness software that keeps your Uniform Guidance compliance current automatically. Daily regulation monitoring and automated compliance tracking.
- For
- finance teams
- Price stated
- Basic $415 per month; Better $900 per month; Best $2,550 per month; Enterprise Get In Touch procurementexpress.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 415 procurementexpress.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start a free trial procurementexpress.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named
- UNICEFSunny Glen Children’s HomeNDN CollectiveYDIRising Ground
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What ProcurementExpress.com's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: procurementexpress.com, procurementexpress.com/pricing, procurementexpress.com/company/security, procurementexpress.com/features, procurementexpress.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProcurementExpress.com's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProcurementExpress.com, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ProcurementExpress.com by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where ProcurementExpress.com is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name ProcurementExpress.com, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.