Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 31 of 41, unchanged
1 category · RankedRydoo
20Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Expense management for mid-market buyers
Rank 19 of 54 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 30% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Rydoo →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business30 of 45
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 54
0%10 labels
criticized challenger
Enterprise15 of 48
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In expense management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Rydoo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 19 of 54 | 30% | 10 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Rydoo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Expense management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 21 → 28 of 46
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 30 → 13 of 39
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 19 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Rydoo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Rydoo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Rydoo/Emburse for AI-driven automation and strong global operations.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Expense management · direct prompt · alternative
“If you rely heavily on an ERP (like NetSuite or SAP): Go with Rydoo” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Expense management · direct prompt · alternative
“Rydoo or Expensify (Best for Reimbursements/Keeping Your Bank)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Expense management · scale prompt · alternative
“Great automation, but pricier than alternatives” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Expense management · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Rydoo - has bank feed connection issues, high and increasing subscription costs.” Llama 4 Maverick · Expense management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Some reviewers describe frustrating account/cancellation experiences” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Expense management · negative prompt · soft negative
“Feedback often points to an outdated user experience.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Expense management · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rydoo, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rydoo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Rydoo, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rydoo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rydoo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 20 answers that named Rydoo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ofx.com11
bill.com10
learn.g2.com8
rydoo.comYour site8
airwallex.com7
emburse.com7
g2.com6
navan.com6
bigtime.net5
brex.com5
Sixty-five of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Rydoo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
rydoo.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Rydoo takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
rydoo.com ranks 4 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Rydoo takes 0% of first choices and Ramp takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “expense management tools”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “expense management software”
7
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“rydoo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 25 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 6,590 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,434 · 115 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,136
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 19 of 54 in expense management
Segment leader
35%
Ramp
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 18 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on rydoo.com
719
subdomains included
Content
89
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
2 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 35 | 1 | 2026-07-08 | Expense management | |
| Report or ebook | 26 | 0 | 2026-04-08 | Expense management | |
| News or press | 15 | 0 | 2022-07-20 | Expense management | |
| Blog | 5 | 0 | 2026-04-08 | Expense management | |
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-11 | Expense management | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2026-06-25 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2026-03-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-07-08Kardex admin work onboarding case study
- 2026-06-25Webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-04-08Guide blog
- 2026-04-08Whitepaper report or ebook
- 2026-04-08Case study case study
- 2026-03-03Finance podcasts fintech podcast or video
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page rydoo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Rydoo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Rydoo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Rydoo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- a smart expense management platform that helps multinational finance teams gain full control over all employee spending, ensure global compliance, and increase expense management efficiency by 4x
- For
- multinational finance teams
- Price stated
- Essentials Plan - EUR 8.00; Pro Plan - EUR 10.00 rydoo.com
- Starting price
- 8.00 rydoo.com
- Integrations claimed
- 35 rydoo.com
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantISO 27001 certifiedSOC 2 Type 2 reportedMulti-country certified paperless expensingISO 27001:2022PCI DSSSOC 2SOC 1
- Hosting
- EuropeFranceIrelandThe NetherlandsGermany
- Customers named
- KardexSCHOTTARAGTVHSwissWesternacher ConsultingSCHOTT AGStow
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial
What Rydoo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: rydoo.com, rydoo.com/pricing, trust.rydoo.com, rydoo.com/solutions/sap-expense, rydoo.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rydoo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rydoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rydoo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Rydoo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rydoo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.