Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 of 46, unchanged
3 categories · RankedSpendflo
37Judge labels
3First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Spend management platfor for mid-market buyers
Rank 11 of 46 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 20% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market11 of 46
2%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise45 of 60
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In spend management platfor · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Spendflo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 2% | 11 of 46 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 44% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 27 of 87 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 42% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 0% | 31 of 128 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by oboloo at 15% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Spendflo held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Spend management platfor · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 44 → 42 of 55
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spend management platfor | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 11 of 46, unchanged |
| Procure-to-pay | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 57 → 27 of 87 |
| Strategic sourcing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 118 → 31 of 128 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Spendflo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Spendflo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative7 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained14 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Spendflo and Fraxion stand out for their comprehensive, all-in-one spend control capabilities” Mistral Small · Spend management platfor · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Benchmark-driven point solutions: Spendflo – strong for indirect spend categories, especially software/SaaS” MiniMax M2.5 · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · alternative
“Mid-market solutions like Procurify, Precoro, and Spendflo can go live in 1-2 months” Kimi K2 · Procure-to-pay · scale prompt · alternative
“Spendflo is positioned as best for SaaS spend optimization” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Spend management platfor · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Spendflo reviews mention it “isn’t the most intuitive” and may require upfront training” GPT-5.4 mini · Spend management platfor · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spendflo, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendflo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Spendflo, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spendflo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spendflo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 37 of the 37 answers that named Spendflo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
spendflo.comYour site35
g2.com17
learn.g2.com11
ramp.com11
softwareconnect.com11
suplari.com11
precoro.com10
mindsprint.com8
rippling.com8
payhawk.com7
Ninety-four of the 129 domain citations in answers naming Spendflo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
spendflo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spendflo takes 2% of first choices and Ramp takes 44%.ShowHide
Search and answers
spendflo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Spendflo takes 2% of first choices and Ramp takes 44%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “spend management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “spend management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“spendflo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 5 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,298 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,961 · 154 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,091
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 11 of 46 in spend management platfor
Segment leader
44%
Ramp
- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 37 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 37 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on spendflo.com
1,598
subdomains included
Content
830
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
37 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 598 | 106 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 146 | 1 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Template or tool | 25 | 0 | 2026-05-20 | ||
| Report or ebook | 23 | 0 | 2025-09-09 | ||
| Case study | 20 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Accounts payable controls blog
- 2026-09-28Accounts payable management blog
- 2026-09-28Accounts payable reconciliation blog
- 2026-09-28Accounts payable workflow blog
- 2026-09-28Procurement orchestration guide blog
- 2026-09-28Integrated payables solutions blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page spendflo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Spendflo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Spendflo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Spendflo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Meet Flo. AI Agents for Procurement.
- For
- Procurement and Finance teams who own the number and do the work.
- Price stated
- You pay only for what Flo closes. Not per seat. Not per user. spendflo.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001 certification
- Customers named
- AcumaticaRevealCaringPuffcoOttimateCrownpeakChurnzeroTabby
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Spendflo's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: spendflo.com, spendflo.com/pricing, spendflo.com/security, spendflo.com/platform-terms-and-conditions, spendflo.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spendflo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spendflo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Spendflo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Spendflo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Spendflo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.