Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 28 of 41, unchanged
QuickBooks Online Expenses
15Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. QuickBooks Online Expenses was named 3 times in Expense management, where Ramp led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 45
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market48 of 54
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise48 of 48
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In expense management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named QuickBooks Online Expenses for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 48 of 54 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 35% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, QuickBooks Online Expenses held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 10 points.
Best category · Expense management · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 24 → 40 of 46
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 41 → 38 of 39
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 10-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 48 of 54 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated QuickBooks Online Expenses across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated QuickBooks Online Expenses across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“can be the most practical choice for expense tracking inside a broader accounting system” Perplexity Sonar · Expense management · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“unreliable credit card/bank feeds (e.g., in QuickBooks Online or Xero), leading to duplicates or errors” Grok 4.1 Fast · Expense management · negative prompt · soft negative
“QuickBooks Online offers a broader suite but at a higher price point.” MiniMax M2.5 · Expense management · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Online Expenses, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Online Expenses was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuickBooks Online Expenses, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuickBooks Online Expenses was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuickBooks Online Expenses. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 15 answers that named QuickBooks Online Expenses and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com8
bill.com7
use.expensify.com7
mercury.com6
nerdwallet.com6
airwallex.com5
capterra.com5
forbes.com5
novo.co5
ramp.com5
Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming QuickBooks Online Expenses came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where QuickBooks Online Expenses stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where QuickBooks Online Expenses stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 20 a month (“quickbooks online expenses”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 142 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on QuickBooks's site (quickbooks.ninja), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 48 of 54 in expense management
Segment leader
35%
Ramp
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 15 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 14 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as QuickBooks Online Expenses; a claim can dispute any of them.
QuickBooks Online 3
Follow QuickBooks Online Expenses
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
QuickBooks is the company behind QuickBooks Online Expenses.ShowHide
The company
QuickBooks is the company behind QuickBooks Online Expenses.
ShowHideOn record
Company recordsIs this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuickBooks Online Expenses's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuickBooks Online Expenses, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuickBooks Online Expenses by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where QuickBooks Online Expenses is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name QuickBooks Online Expenses, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.