Financial consolidation
Asked as “financial consolidation software”, and as “multi-entity consolidation tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
24%
Contested · Sage Intacct 16%
24Prophix16Sage Intacct13Joiin47others
24% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prophix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs VenaProphix vs FathomProphix vs BlackLineJoiin vs Sage IntacctJoiin vs PlanfulJoiin vs Oracle NetSuiteJoiin vs VenaJoiin vs FathomJoiin vs BlackLineSage Intacct vs PlanfulSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs FathomSage Intacct vs BlackLinePlanful vs Oracle NetSuitePlanful vs VenaPlanful vs FathomPlanful vs BlackLineOracle NetSuite vs VenaOracle NetSuite vs FathomOracle NetSuite vs BlackLineVena vs FathomVena vs BlackLineFathom vs BlackLine
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Prophix24%
Prophix24%02Sage Intacct16%
Sage Intacct16%03Planful13%
Planful13%04Joiin13%
Joiin13%05Oracle NetSuite9%
Oracle NetSuite9%06Vena2%
Vena2%07OneStream2%
OneStream2%08Fathom2%
Fathom2%09Datarails2%
Datarails2%10Cube0%
Cube0%11BlackLine0%
BlackLine0%12CCH Tagetik0%
CCH Tagetik0%What they warned about
One of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
OneStream30%
11 of 37 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“steer clear of **OneStream**, **Oracle Cloud EPM**, or **SAP Group Reporting**” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
Microsoft Excel67%
4 of 6 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“Why to avoid: Human error: Excel remains the most error-prone consolidation "tool" in corporate finance” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Sage Intacct21%
4 of 19 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Starts around $12,000/year (single user) with implementation costs of $5K $50K” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Oracle Hyperion88%
7 of 8 labels negative · 3 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“you generally want to avoid the massive legacy players (like Oracle Hyperion, which is too expensive/rigid)” Qwen 3.7 Flash, scale prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 956 links across 228 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Prophix42 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Consolidate.io32 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
vendor site · HighRadius30 answers · 36 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 24 citations · 8 models
22 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Maxima21 answers · 21 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware18 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Bluecopa16 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 18 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Planful14 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 15 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Datarails13 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
41 answers · 13 models
26 answers · 8 models
21 answers · 8 models
20 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 10 models
12 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial consolidation software”, “consolidation tools”, “financial consolidation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prophix prophix.com | 24% | 237 | 1,600 | 41 | 14,138 | $109 | 103 | |
| Sage sage.com Sage Intacct 16% | 16% | 433 | 246,000 | 90,599 | 1,737,127 company | $114,671 | 78 | |
| Planful planful.com | 13% | 341 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Joiin joiin.co | 13% | 67 | 590 | 4 | 152 | 0 | 6 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 9% | 9% | 489 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Vena venasolutions.com | 2% | 344 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | 3 |
| OneStream onestream.com | 2% | 478 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 2 |
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 2% | 204 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Fluence Technologies | 2% | 90 | 1 | |||||
| Microsoft Dynamics microsoft.com Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central 2% | 2% | 115 | 2,900 | 50 | 145,358,109 company | $12,455 | 103 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (consolidate.io, highradius.com, linkedin.com). The first result for “best financial consolidation software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial consolidation software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-entity consolidation tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top consolidation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial consolidation software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a financial consolidation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which consolidation tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Planful, Prophixno first choiceChangedno first choiceJoiinno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
DOKKA, HighRadius, OneStream, VenaTwelve alternatives
Board, CCH Tagetik, Cube, Datarails, Fathom, Joiin, LiveFlow, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, VenaThree alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Microsoft Excel, PlanfulGPT-5.4 miniOneStreamOracle NetSuiteChangedagainst: XeroOracle Financial Consolidation and CloseAdra Balanceragainst: Finalyzer, Planful, Quick Consols, Sage Intacctno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixOne alternative
SoftLedgerTwo alternatives
SAP MDG Consolidation, SAP S/4HANA Consolidation / SAP Financial Consolidation-related capabilitiesOne alternative
BrizoConsolGemini 3.5 FlashProphixagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCNominal, Sage IntacctChangedagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCno first choiceJoiinagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reportingagainst: Microsoft Excel, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Four alternatives
Anaplan Financial Consolidation, Lucanet, Planful, VenaFour alternatives
Intuit Enterprise Suite, Joiin, Oracle NetSuite, ProphixNine alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Joiin, LiveFlow, Lucanet, Nominal, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, ProphixFour alternatives
Calxa, Fathom, G-Accon, Syft AnalyticsSix alternatives
Fluence Technologies, Lucanet, Numeric, Planful, Prophix, VenaPerplexity SonarProphixOracle NetSuiteChangedagainst: Sage Intacctno first choiceCentage Planning Maestro, Fathomagainst: Sage Intacctno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
Cube, HighRadius, Planful, VenaFive alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Planful, Prophix, Vena, WorkivaOne alternative
QuickBooks OnlineGrok 4.1 FastProphixagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle, SAPSage IntacctChangedagainst: Oracle NetSuiteOneStreamSyft Analyticsagainst: Planful, QuickBooks Online, insightsoftwareno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
Centage Planning Maestro, Planful, SoftLedger, VenaThree alternatives
Acumatica Cloud ERP, Joiin, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralFive alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Prophix, WorkivaOne alternative
LiveFlowFive alternatives
Cube, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, VenaMistral SmallPlanful, ProphixOracle NetSuiteChangedno first choiceDatarailsno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
One alternative
OneStreamTwo alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Sage IntacctTwo alternatives
Joiin, KonsolidatorDeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophixagainst: OneStreamSage IntacctChangedOneStreamagainst: FloQast, Oracle HyperionJoiinagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, OneStream, Sage Intacct, WorkivaPlanful, Prophix, Venaagainst: CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Trintechagainst: Informatica, National Debt Relief, Oracle Data Quality
Two alternatives
Cube, FloQastThree alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, Planful, VenaFour alternatives
Lucanet, Prophix, SAP, WorkivaTwo alternatives
DOKKA, DualEntryLlama 4 MaverickProphixProphixHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Bluecopa, Cubesoftware, HighRadiusFive alternatives
Acumatica Cloud ERP, LiveFlow, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance, Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctQwen 3.7 FlashProphixSage IntacctChangedOneStreamTrullionagainst: Oracle, SAPno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperionagainst: OneStream, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Four alternatives
Cube, OneStream, Pigment, VenaOne alternative
Oracle NetSuiteFive alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP BPC, Trintech, WorkdayThree alternatives
Fathom, FloQast, VenaEight alternatives
Anaplan, BlackBay, BlackLine, HYP, Klevin, OneStream, Trullian, VenaKimi K2Fluence Technologies, Planfulagainst: OneStreamSage IntacctChangedagainst: OneStreamOneStreamJoiinagainst: Excel templatesno first choiceagainst: FloQast, Oracle FCC, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Three alternatives
Datarails, FloQast, VenaTwo alternatives
Oracle NetSuite, ProphixTwo alternatives
Prophix, WorkivaTwo alternatives
Fathom, ScaleXPGLM 4.7 FlashXProphix, Sage IntacctOracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctChangedno first choiceKonsolidatagainst: Cube, Oracle NetSuiteno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Cube, FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, PlanfulSeven alternatives
Futrli, Joiin, LiveFlow, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, OneStream, Syft AnalyticsFour alternatives
Airbyte, Microsoft Power Query, Qlik Talend, SkyviaSix alternatives
Datarails, Fathom, Joiin, QuickBooks Online, Sage Intacct, VenaMiniMax M2.5Planful, Prophixagainst: OneStreamAcumatica Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business CentralChangedno first choiceJoiinno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Fluence TechnologiesOne alternative
G-AcconTwo alternatives
Sage Intacct, ZebraSoftFive alternatives
Fluence Technologies, OneStream, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:15 | yes | 12 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:33 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:25 | yes | 9 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 15 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:46 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 13 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 18 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 15 | 93 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:37 | yes | 16 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 17 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:48 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 21 | 39 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 12 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 25 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:35 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 17 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:37 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:22 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:56 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 10 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 19 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 12 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:46 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 17 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:20 | no | 0 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 17 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:35 | no | 0 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:12 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:21 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 25 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:05 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Centage read as Centage Planning Maestro
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
Excel/spreadsheets read as Microsoft Excel
Fluence read as Fluence Technologies
Host Analytics read as Planful
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (formerly Hyperion/HFM) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA group reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Unresolved, counted raw
BlackBay
BrizoConsol
Cayman / Cority
HYP
Klevin
Microsoft Power Query (Get & Transform)
National Debt Relief
Oracle Data Quality
Oracle FCC
SAP MDG Consolidation
SAP S/4HANA Consolidation / SAP Financial Consolidation-related capabilities
Singer
SnapLogic
ZebraSoft
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.