Financial consolidation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “financial consolidation software”, and as “multi-entity consolidation tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 49 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63OneStream10Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM04CCH Tagetik22others
63% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Prophix vs Oracle NetSuiteProphix vs VenaProphix vs FathomProphix vs BlackLineJoiin vs Sage IntacctJoiin vs PlanfulJoiin vs Oracle NetSuiteJoiin vs VenaJoiin vs FathomJoiin vs BlackLineSage Intacct vs PlanfulSage Intacct vs Oracle NetSuiteSage Intacct vs VenaSage Intacct vs FathomSage Intacct vs BlackLinePlanful vs Oracle NetSuitePlanful vs VenaPlanful vs FathomPlanful vs BlackLineOracle NetSuite vs VenaOracle NetSuite vs FathomOracle NetSuite vs BlackLineVena vs FathomVena vs BlackLineFathom vs BlackLine
One product takes 63% of first choices here, so the chart would put twelve markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small and Kimi K2 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan54%
7 of 13 labels negative · 7 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid Anaplan and Oracle Cloud EPM (especially without a secured ELA)” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM14%
5 of 37 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“you should avoid traditional "per-seat" EPM models (like standard Oracle EPM), where adding users can drive costs into the millions” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
OneStream8%
5 of 62 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“many enterprise deals are quote-based and can still become expensive depending on scope; ... I'd compare its commercial model carefully” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
Planful25%
5 of 20 labels negative · 5 of 12 models
“per-user pricing structure is noted to become prohibitively expensive for large enterprises as they scale” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1090 links across 288 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Maxima44 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · OneStream36 answers · 59 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Prophix31 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · HighRadius29 answers · 51 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow28 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Planful25 answers · 28 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Bluecopa24 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware21 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Wolters Kluwer15 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
44 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best financial consolidation software”, “consolidation tools”, “financial consolidation software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OneStream onestream.com | 63% | 478 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 2 |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 10% | 10% | 273 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 4%, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close 2% | 6% | 489 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| CCH Tagetik wolterskluwer.com | 4% | 131 | 390 | 0 | 2,373,906 | $15,481 | 28 | 5 |
| SAP S/4HANA Finance sap.com SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting 2% | 2% | 34 | 8 | 2,214,514 company | $1,251 | 23 | ||
| Workiva workiva.com | 2% | 596 | 22,200 | 524 | 58,186 | $23 | 64 | |
| Planful planful.com | 2% | 341 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Board board.com | 2% | 88 | 90,500 | 612,482 | 44,405 | 106 | ||
| Acumatica acumatica.com Acumatica Cloud ERP 2% | 2% | 14 | 12,100 | 242 | 130,487 company | $2,934 | 120 | |
| Quick Consols quickconsols.com | 2% | 6 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (gartner.com, highradius.com, onestream.com, wolterskluwer.com). The first result for “best financial consolidation software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best financial consolidation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-entity consolidation tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade consolidation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best financial consolidation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a financial consolidation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which consolidation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5OneStreamOneStream, Oracle NetSuiteChangedOneStreamJoiinagainst: OneStreamno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, Oracle NetSuite
Six alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Planful, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Sage IntacctOne alternative
Sage IntacctEight alternatives
BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Centage Planning Maestro, Datarails, Joiin, LiveFlow, Planful, Syft AnalyticsOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMGPT-5.4 miniOneStreamagainst: BlackLineOracle Financial Consolidation and CloseChangedOracle Financial Consolidation and Closeagainst: BlackLine, WorkivaCCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: OneStreamno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingTwo alternatives
SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Workday Close and ConsolidationTwo alternatives
OneStream, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingGemini 3.5 FlashOneStreamagainst: MaximaOneStreamHeldOneStreamagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive PlanningOracle Fusion Cloud EPMagainst: Limelightno first choiceagainst: Broadcom/VMware, Fathom, Joiin, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPC
Five alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Fluence Technologies, HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PlanfulFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingThree alternatives
OneStream, Quick Consols, WorkivaPerplexity SonarOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamagainst: Oracle Hyperion Financial ManagementOracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, WorkivaOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamGrok 4.1 FastCCH Tagetik, OneStreamagainst: Anaplan, Cube, ProphixOneStreamChangedagainst: Prophix, VenaOneStreamOneStreamagainst: Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, PlanfulOneStreamagainst: Oracle, SAP, Spreadsheets
Three alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, WorkivaThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAPThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, SAP Financial Consolidation, WorkivaOne alternative
AnaplanMistral SmallOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceChangedOneStreamOneStreamno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful
Two alternatives
IBM Cognos Controller, PlanfulSeven alternatives
BlackLine, Bluecopa, CCH Tagetik, Datarails, HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, PlanfulDeepSeek V4 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStreamagainst: FloGuard / FloQast, SAP BPCWorkivaagainst: BlackLine, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMOneStreamagainst: BlackLineagainst: Fivetran, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, SAP BPC, Spreadsheet-based consolidation, Stitch
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, WorkivaFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, WorkivaFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Hyperion Financial Management, Qlik, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamFour alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive PlanningLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceOneStreamno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful
Five alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, Prophix, Sage IntacctQwen 3.7 FlashOneStreamOneStreamHeldno first choiceAcumatica Cloud ERPagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuiteno first choiceagainst: Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP ECC
Four alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, Planful, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Alto, BlackLine, Datarails, Oracle Cloud ERP, SAP S/4HANATwo alternatives
OneStream, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingKimi K2OneStreamagainst: AnaplanOracle NetSuiteChangedOneStreamOneStreamOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planfulagainst: Datarails, IBM Cognos Controller, SAP BPC, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Venaagainst: Microsoft Excel
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMFour alternatives
OneStream, SAP S/4HANA Finance, Sage Intacct, Workday Financial ManagementFour alternatives
Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, ProphixTwo alternatives
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, WorkivaOne alternative
ProphixGLM 4.7 FlashXOneStreamOneStreamHeldAnaplan, OneStreamNumericagainst: Oracle Financial Consolidationno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Looker, Microsoft Power BI, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Planful, SAP ECC consolidation tools, Tableau, legacy Oracle EBS
Three alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close, ProphixThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctFour alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle NetSuite, Sage Intacct, WorkivaOne alternative
OneStreamMiniMax M2.5OneStreamOneStreamHeldOneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMBoardagainst: Anaplan, CCH Tagetik, Joiin, OneStream, Planful, Quick ConsolsOneStreamnothing named
Three alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group ReportingThree alternatives
BlackLine, Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctThree alternatives
CCH Tagetik, SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
CCH Tagetik, Workday Adaptive PlanningBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 12 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 24 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:06 | yes | 12 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:50 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:34 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:26 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 18 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 15 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 11 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:46 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:04 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:13 | yes | 25 | 78 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 13 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:02 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:33 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 23 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 9 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:28 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:21 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:48 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:53 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 11 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 6 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:42 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 23 | 57 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 10 | 55 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 14 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:36 | yes | 18 | 37 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acumatica read as Acumatica Cloud ERP
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Enterprise Performance Management) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS + Account Reconciliation) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS - Financial Consolidation and Close) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (Financial Consolidation and Close) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (formerly Hyperion) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle Cloud EPM (without an enterprise license agreement) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM (FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud (FCCS) read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle FCCS read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle FCCS (Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud Service) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud Service (FCCS) read as Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close
Prophix One read as Prophix
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online
SAP Group Reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA Group Reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
SAP S/4HANA group reporting read as SAP S/4HANA Finance for Group Reporting
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Unresolved, counted raw
Alto
Broadcom/VMware
Databricks Lakehouse Federation
FloGuard / FloQast
HCL WorldSoft (CorpONE)
HighRadius Financial Consolidation Software
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud, IDMC
Microsoft Azure Data Factory, ADF
OneLake shortcuts
Oracle EPM Cloud – Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud Service / Oracle Hyperion Financial Management
Oracle Financial Consolidation
Prophix Financial Close Software
Qlik Talend Cloud
SAP BPC 10.1 for NetWeaver
SAP Business Consolidation
SAP ECC consolidation tools
SAP FC
Snowflake Secure Data Sharing
Spreadsheet-based consolidation (Excel "super-models")
Workday Close and Consolidation
legacy Oracle EBS
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.