FP&A platforms
Asked as “FP&A software”, and as “financial planning and analysis platform”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
20%
Contested · Fathom 15%
20Planful15Fathom13Vena52others
20% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Vena vs FathomVena vs CubeVena vs ProphixVena vs DatarailsPigment vs ClockworkPigment vs PlanfulPigment vs FathomPigment vs CubePigment vs ProphixPigment vs DatarailsClockwork vs PlanfulClockwork vs FathomClockwork vs CubeClockwork vs ProphixClockwork vs DatarailsPlanful vs FathomPlanful vs CubePlanful vs ProphixPlanful vs DatarailsFathom vs CubeFathom vs ProphixFathom vs DatarailsCube vs ProphixCube vs DatarailsProphix vs Datarails
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Planful20%
Planful20%02Fathom15%
Fathom15%03Vena13%
Vena13%04Cube7%
Cube7%05Abacum7%
Abacum7%06Drivetrain6%
Drivetrain6%07Centage4%
Centage4%08Clockwork4%
Clockwork4%09Pigment4%
Pigment4%10Workday Adaptive Planning4%
Workday Adaptive Planning4%11Aleph2%
Aleph2%12LiveFlow2%
LiveFlow2%13Datarails2%
Datarails2%14Prophix0%
Prophix0%15Jirav0%
Jirav0%16Board0%
Board0%17OneStream0%
OneStream0%18Anaplan0%
Anaplan0%What they warned about
Two of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Anaplan49%
26 of 53 labels negative · 13 of 12 models · 10 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise heavy platforms like Anaplan/OneStream/IBM Planning Analytics unless you have a dedicated model builder and >12-month implementation runway.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Workday Adaptive Planning39%
16 of 41 labels negative · 12 of 12 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid legacy enterprise solutions (like Workday Adaptive Planning or Oracle Cloud EPM) unless you have a dedicated system administrator.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Pigment31%
11 of 35 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“targeted at mid-market to enterprise users and may be overkill for smaller organizations” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Planful18%
11 of 60 labels negative · 10 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“Another enterprise-grade solution that may be unnecessarily complex and expensive for smaller teams.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1071 links across 196 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
38 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G235 answers · 61 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Drivetrain35 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Cubesoftware33 answers · 45 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Centage28 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 40 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Datarails26 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Prophix25 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Board19 answers · 22 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cledara19 answers · 19 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 12 models
18 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best fp&a software”, “fp&a platforms”, “fp&a software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Planful planful.com | 20% | 341 | 3,600 | 685,726 | 58,997 | $137 | 120 | |
| Fathom fathomhq.com | 15% | 204 | 90,500 | 6,657 | 74,881 | 38 | ||
| Vena venasolutions.com | 13% | 344 | 12,100 | 3,928 | 62,294 | $13,792 | 58 | |
| Cube cubesoftware.com | 7% | 349 | 90,500 | 152,613 | 168,764 | 13 | 1 | |
| Abacum abacum.ai | 7% | 73 | 1,300 | 18 | 79,014 | $26 | 16 | 7 |
| Drivetrain drivetrain.ai | 6% | 103 | 18,100 | 2,818 | 8,983 | $134 | 1 | |
| Centage centage.com | 4% | 36 | 1,000 | 11 | 1,692 | 6 | 5 | |
| Clockwork clockwork.ai | 4% | 55 | 27,100 | 7,178 | 463 | 4 | ||
| Pigment pigment.com | 4% | 165 | 49,500 | 25,645 | 12,248 | 22 | ||
| Workday workday.com Workday Adaptive Planning 4% | 4% | 407 | 1,220,000 | 23,848 | 2,213,450 company | 80 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (centage.com, cubesoftware.com, g2.com, getaleph.com, golimelight.com, prophix.com). The first result for “best fp&a software” is irisfinance.co.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best FP&A software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which financial planning and analysis platform would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top FP&A platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best FP&A software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a FP&A software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which FP&A platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Aleph, CubePlanfulChangedAleph, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Board, Oracle Essbase, Oracle NetSuite, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Pigment, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Centage, Prophix, VenaNine alternatives
Anaplan, Centage, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, RunwayFive alternatives
Causal, Excel, Fathom, Jirav, PlanGuruGPT-5.4 miniPlanfulagainst: AnaplanPlanfulHeldno first choiceagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP Analytics CloudFathom, LiveFlowagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, OneStream, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Fathom, Pigment, Planful, Vena
Two alternatives
Pigment, VenaTwo alternatives
Anaplan, VenaThree alternatives
Coefficient, Cube, JoiinGemini 3.5 FlashVenaCube, PigmentChangedagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: AnaplanFathom, G-Acconagainst: Anaplan, Causal, Finmark, Pry, Workday Adaptive Planningno first choiceagainst: Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting - NSPB, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Aleph, Bob Finance, Cube, Pigment, PlanfulFour alternatives
Aleph, Bob Finance, Planful, VenaEight alternatives
Bob Finance, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningFive alternatives
Adlega, Clockwork, Cube, Jirav, LiveFlowPerplexity SonarAbacum, PlanfulVenaChangedAnaplanCubeagainst: QuickBooks Onlineno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Oracle Essbase, Pigment, Planful
Two alternatives
Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
PlanfulNine alternatives
Board, Cube, Datarails, IBM Planning Analytics, OneStream, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningTwo alternatives
Fathom, FinmarkGrok 4.1 FastVenaPlanfulChangedno first choiceFathomagainst: Cube, Datarails, Jiravno first choiceagainst: Oracle, SAPagainst: Anaplan, Datarails, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Four alternatives
Centage, Cube, Datarails, PlanfulTwo alternatives
Centage, ProphixThree alternatives
Clockwork, Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel, Reach ReportingMistral SmallCentageAbacum, DrivetrainChangedWorkday Adaptive PlanningClockwork, FathomWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Oracle Hyperionagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Abacum, Drivetrain, Planful, Prophix, VenaTwo alternatives
Datarails, PlanfulTwo alternatives
Anaplan, PigmentTwo alternatives
LiveFlow, Reach ReportingSix alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, Planful, Prophix, SAP Analytics Cloud, VenaDeepSeek V4 FlashDatarails, DrivetrainPlanfulChangedno first choicePlanGuruagainst: Anaplan, Centage, Cube, Pigment, VenaWorkday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Board, OneStreamagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Jirav, OneStream, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Cube, Jirav, Planful, Prophix, Workday Adaptive PlanningFour alternatives
Abacum, Cube, Jirav, ProphixFourteen alternatives
Abacum, Anaplan, Board, Centage, Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Jirav, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, SAP Analytics Cloud Planning, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Clockwork, IBM Planning Analytics, LiveFlowFive alternatives
Centage, Limelight, Planful, Prophix, VenaLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Qwen 3.7 FlashVenaPlanfulChangedagainst: NetSuite SuitePlanning, Workday Adaptive PlanningAnaplan, OneStreamCheddaragainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Venano first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, SAP BPCagainst: Abacum, Anaplan, Cube, Jirav, Mosaic, Pigment, Workday Adaptive Planning
Three alternatives
Aleph, Cube, PlanfulTwo alternatives
Pulse, VenaThree alternatives
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningThree alternatives
Float, Kretio, LivePlanKimi K2Cubeagainst: MosaicVenaChangedagainst: Anaplan, OneStreamno first choiceFathom, Finmark, Syft Analyticsagainst: Excel/Google SheetsCentage, Venaagainst: Anaplan, Workday Adaptive Planningagainst: Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, Jirav, Oracle Hyperion, Pigment, Prophix, SAP BPC, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Five alternatives
Aleph, Datarails, Drivetrain, Jirav, VenaTwo alternatives
Centage, CubeTen alternatives
Anaplan, Cube, Datarails, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive PlanningOne alternative
JiravTwo alternatives
Planful, ProphixGLM 4.7 FlashXAbacum, DrivetrainPlanfulChangedno first choiceFathomagainst: Anaplanno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, OneStream, Pigment, Planful, Prophix, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Cube, VenaThree alternatives
Cube, Datarails, VenaFour alternatives
Budgyt, Cube, LiveFlow, PlanGuruMiniMax M2.5VenaPlanfulChangedWorkday Adaptive PlanningFathom, Finmarkagainst: Cubeno first choiceagainst: Anaplan, Pigment, Planful, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning
Two alternatives
Drivetrain, ParseThree alternatives
Anaplan, Prophix, VenaFive alternatives
Anaplan, Centage, Cube, Planful, VenaFive alternatives
Excel or Google Sheets, Jirav, LiveFlow, PivotXL, PlanGuruBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 23 | 50 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:31 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 20 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 9 | 45 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 4 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 16 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 17 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:07 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:30 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 15 | 12 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 6 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 8 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:30 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:47 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:38 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 24 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:43 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 23 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 21 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 21 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:31 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:27 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:10 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 14 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:51 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 20 | 93 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 17 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:27 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 25 | 69 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 24 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adaptive Insights read as Workday Adaptive Planning
Clockwork.ai read as Clockwork
Oracle Cloud EPM Planning read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM Cloud read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix One read as Prophix
Vena Solutions read as Vena
Unresolved, counted raw
Cheddar
FinanceOS
Google Sheets or Microsoft Excel
Kretio
NetSuite Planning and Budgeting - NSPB
NetSuite SuitePlanning
Parse
Plika
QOBRA
Retriever
Syntellis
Zohos Analytics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.