Account reconciliation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “account reconciliation software”, and as “bank reconciliation automation”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 52 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63BlackLine08HighRadius06FloQast23others
63% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
FloQast vs Zoho BooksFloQast vs HighRadiusFloQast vs XeroFloQast vs Prophix OneNumeric vs Trintech AdraNumeric vs QuickBooks OnlineNumeric vs Zoho BooksNumeric vs HighRadiusNumeric vs XeroNumeric vs Prophix OneTrintech Adra vs QuickBooks OnlineTrintech Adra vs Zoho BooksTrintech Adra vs HighRadiusTrintech Adra vs XeroTrintech Adra vs Prophix OneQuickBooks Online vs Zoho BooksQuickBooks Online vs HighRadiusQuickBooks Online vs XeroQuickBooks Online vs Prophix OneZoho Books vs HighRadiusZoho Books vs XeroZoho Books vs Prophix OneHighRadius vs XeroHighRadius vs Prophix OneXero vs Prophix One
One product takes 63% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
BlackLine11%
8 of 72 labels negative · 8 of 12 models
“dedicated enterprise point solutions like **BlackLine** ... can easily scale into millions of dollars annually just in user licensing fees when deployed at that scale.(1)Z” Gemini 3.5 Flash, budget prompt
Microsoft Excel100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
“Why to avoid:** While Excel is ubiquitous and familiar, it's fundamentally inadequate for enterprise-scale reconciliation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
FloQast24%
9 of 38 labels negative · 5 of 12 models · 4 hard negative
“close management software without deep transaction matching (e.g., certain FloQast configurations limited to checklists)” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Numeric28%
5 of 18 labels negative · 4 of 12 models · 2 hard negative
“Close-management / task-orchestration-first tools marketed to mid-market teams, e.g. DOKKA, FloQast, Numeric, SolveXia” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
83 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1089 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Bluecopa57 answers · 105 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Numeric49 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Prophix41 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
39 answers · 39 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Maxima36 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · HighRadius30 answers · 66 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow30 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ramp29 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airwallex21 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Worldmetrics19 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Kolleno19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
45 answers · 12 models
41 answers · 11 models
39 answers · 12 models
33 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 12 models
33 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “account reconciliation software”, “best account reconciliation software”, “reconciliation tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackLine blackline.com | 63% | 425 | 27,100 | 1,255 | 28,740 | $4,066 | 79 | 2 |
| Trintech trintech.com Trintech Cadency 6%, Trintech 2%, Trintech Adra 2% | 10% | 101 | 1,900 | 44 | 30,370 | 13 | 2 | |
| HighRadius highradius.com | 8% | 691 | 6,600 | 118 | 294,561 | $2,272 | 120 | 1 |
| FloQast floqast.com | 6% | 377 | 9,900 | 194 | 41,324 | $5,039 | 76 | |
| Oracle parent site Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud 4%, Oracle Hyperion 0% | 4% | 56 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Numeric numeric.io | 4% | 218 | 12,100 | 38,006 | 94,254 | $426 | 9 | 4 |
| OneStream onestream.com | 2% | 478 | 12,100 | 703 | 32,233 | $36 | 120 | 5 |
| Oracle Fusion oracle.com Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM 2% | 2% | 273 | 260 | 0 | 7,410,638 company | $247 | 101 | |
| Kyriba kyriba.com | 2% | 244 | 4,400 | 155 | 38,514 | 45 | ||
| ReconArt reconart.com | 0% | 39 | 110 | 0 | 384 | 17 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 15 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (bluecopa.com, highradius.com, numeric.io, ramp.com). The first result for “account reconciliation software” is highradius.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best account reconciliation software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which bank reconciliation automation would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade reconciliation tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best account reconciliation software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an account reconciliation software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which reconciliation tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5BlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineOracle Fusion Cloud EPMno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, DOKKA, NetSuite Account Reconciliation, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconNET, Trintech Cadency
Four alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Trintech, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
HighRadius, Trintech CadencyFive alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, SolveXia, Trintech CadencyTwo alternatives
BlackLine, Trintech CadencyGPT-5.4 miniBlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineagainst: HighRadiusOracle Account Reconciliation Cloudagainst: BlackLineno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Oracle Close / Reconciliations, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP cash/bank statement automationEight alternatives
CCH Tagetik, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle Hyperion, SAP Reconciliation, Trintech, Workday, XelixOne alternative
TrintechGemini 3.5 FlashBlackLine, HighRadiusBlackLineChangedBlackLineOneStreamagainst: BlackLine, Oracle Fusion Cloud ARCSBlackLineagainst: Adyen, Alteryx, Automation Anywhere, FloQast, KNIME, Microsoft Excel, Numeric, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle NetSuite, PayPal, Qlik Talend, SAP Reconciliation, Stripe, Trintech Adra, UiPath
Four alternatives
CCH Tagetik, FloQast, OneStream, TrintechThree alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, TrintechSeven alternatives
AutoRek, Duco, FloQast, Gresham Technologies, Numeric, SmartStream, TrintechTwo alternatives
FloQast, ReconArtTwo alternatives
FloQast, TrintechPerplexity SonarBlackLineHighRadiusChangedagainst: ReconArtBlackLine, Trintech CadencyBlackLineno first choiceagainst: Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Oracle NetSuite
Three alternatives
HighRadius, ReconArt, Trintech CadencyOne alternative
BlackLineFive alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Oracle NetSuite, ReconArtOne alternative
Trintech CadencyGrok 4.1 FastBlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineHeldBlackLine, TrintechBlackLineagainst: FloQast, Numericno first choiceagainst: BlackLine, FloQast, QuickBooks/Xero add-ons, Trintech
Two alternatives
CCH Tagetik, OneStreamThree alternatives
HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, Trintech CadencyThree alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStreamFive alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM Account Reconciliation, Trintech Adra, Trintech Cadency, WorkivaMistral SmallBlackLine, Oracle Account Reconciliation CloudBlackLine, HighRadiusChangedBlackLineBlackLine, Trintech Cadencyagainst: Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Sage Intacctno first choiceagainst: Oracle ERP Reconciliation, SAP Reconciliation
Two alternatives
ReconArt, SAP Fioneer Financial ControlDeepSeek V4 FlashBlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineHeldBlackLineagainst: FloQastBlackLineagainst: FloQast, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, Trintech Cadency, WorkivaBlackLineagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, QuickBooks Online, Xero
One alternative
TrintechTwo alternatives
HighRadius, TrintechFour alternatives
HighRadius, ReconArt, SkyStem ART, TrintechOne alternative
HighRadiusFour alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, OneStream, TrintechLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceBlackLineChangedBlackLineBlackLineno first choiceagainst: BlackLine
Qwen 3.7 FlashBlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineNumericagainst: BlackLineno first choiceagainst: Bluecopa, Calypso, FloQast, Numerica, Prophix One, ReconArt, SmartStream
Four alternatives
HighRadius, OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM, SAP BPCTwo alternatives
HighRadius, TrintechTwo alternatives
OneStream, TrintechOne alternative
Oracle Account Reconciliation CloudKimi K2BlackLine, Trintech CadencyBlackLineChangedBlackLine, TrintechFloQastagainst: BlackLine, Trintech CadencyBlackLineagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel, Oracle NetSuite
One alternative
FloQastOne alternative
Trintech CadencyFour alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud, ReconArtFour alternatives
FloQast, Numeric, OneStream, TrintechGLM 4.7 FlashXBlackLineBlackLineHeldBlackLineagainst: Oracle NetSuite, Sage IntacctNumericno first choiceagainst: Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel
Four alternatives
HighRadius, Numeric, OneStream, TrintechThree alternatives
FloQast, HighRadius, ReconArtThree alternatives
FloQast, ReconArt, TrintechOne alternative
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMMiniMax M2.5no first choiceHighRadiusChangedno first choiceFloQastagainst: NumericBlackLinenothing named
Two alternatives
BlackLine, ReconArtTwo alternatives
OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPMTwo alternatives
FloQast, TrintechBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:14 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:51 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:20 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:10 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 18 | 274 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:52 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:45 | yes | 10 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 15 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 21 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 8 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 15 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 20 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:40 | yes | 8 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 17 | 28 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:47 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:18 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 19 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:38 | yes | 21 | 36 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 8 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:25 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 17 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 21 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 9 | 84 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:42 | yes | 23 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:56 | yes | 9 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 18 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:36 | yes | 17 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:01 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:42 | yes | 7 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 19 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:50 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 18 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 12 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:19 | yes | 21 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 18 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 9 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:21 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 12 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 19 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:22 | yes | 10 | 64 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 13 | 190 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:23 | yes | 5 | 64 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adra read as Trintech Adra
Adra (by Trintech) read as Trintech Adra
Excel read as Microsoft Excel
NetSuite read as Oracle NetSuite
Oracle read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud Service read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud Service (ARCS) read as Oracle Account Reconciliation Cloud
Oracle Cloud EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Oracle EPM read as Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM
Prophix read as Prophix One
QuickBooks read as QuickBooks Online
SAP read as SAP Reconciliation
Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik read as CCH Tagetik
Unresolved, counted raw
FIS Data Integrity Manager
Gresham Technologies (Clareti)
KNIME
Microsoft's Finance Agent
NetSuite Account Reconciliation
Numerica
Optimus
Oracle Close / Reconciliations
Oracle ERP Reconciliation
Oracle Fusion Cloud ARCS
Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM Account Reconciliation
Oracle Recon
SAP Account Substantiation
SAP Fioneer Financial Control
SAP cash/bank statement automation
Satva Solutions
Satya Solutions
Trintech with both Cadency and Adra
Trintech's Cadency platform
insightsoftware JustPerform
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.