Expense management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “expense management software”, and as “employee expense reporting tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, twelve models each.
Standing · first-choice share
68%
Clear leader
68SAP Concur15Ramp04BILL Spend & Expense13others
68% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all twelve models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Ramp vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRamp vs ExpensifyRamp vs NavanRamp vs SAP ConcurZoho Expense vs SpendeskZoho Expense vs Rippling SpendZoho Expense vs BILL Spend & ExpenseZoho Expense vs ExpensifyZoho Expense vs NavanZoho Expense vs SAP ConcurSpendesk vs Rippling SpendSpendesk vs BILL Spend & ExpenseSpendesk vs ExpensifySpendesk vs NavanSpendesk vs SAP ConcurRippling Spend vs BILL Spend & ExpenseRippling Spend vs ExpensifyRippling Spend vs NavanRippling Spend vs SAP ConcurBILL Spend & Expense vs ExpensifyBILL Spend & Expense vs NavanBILL Spend & Expense vs SAP ConcurExpensify vs NavanExpensify vs SAP ConcurNavan vs SAP Concur
One product takes 68% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Four products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Seven of twelve models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2 and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SAP Concur20%
15 of 76 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 3 hard negative
“**Avoid Concur** unless you have a mandatory SAP ERP integration requirement, as its per-report pricing can become unpredictable and costly.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Brex35%
17 of 49 labels negative · 11 of 12 models · 1 hard negative
“**Avoid**: Standard per-user plans (Expensify at $5/user, Brex at $12/user)” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Ramp18%
10 of 55 labels negative · 10 of 12 models
“Lean card-first tools like Ramp or Brex — ... best when the organization primarily needs corporate cards and basic expense tracking” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Expensify44%
17 of 39 labels negative · 9 of 12 models · 5 hard negative
““Expensify isn’t a viable option for scaling companies who need to manage large volumes of transactions, control spend at scale, and improve their financial processes.”” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the twelve in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 12 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1080 links across 185 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page.
vendor site · Emburse45 answers · 67 citations · 13 models
vendor site · OFX42 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
37 answers · 58 citations · 12 models
vendor site · BILL36 answers · 49 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Spendesk36 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Airwallex35 answers · 44 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Brex34 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G233 answers · 48 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Ramp31 answers · 52 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Navan24 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Expensify21 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G221 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
42 answers · 12 models
35 answers · 11 models
33 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 7 models
16 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best expense management software”, “expense management software”, “expense management tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP Concur sap.com | 68% | 414 | 74,000 | 502 | 2,214,514 | $1,251 | 23 | |
| Ramp ramp.com | 15% | 1042 | 246,000 | 49,733 | 770,056 | $13,511 | 120 | 3 |
| Emburse emburse.com | 4% | 84 | 18,100 | 242 | 40,700 | $266 | 51 | |
| BILL bill.com BILL Spend & Expense 4% | 4% | 342 | 2,740,000 | 1,063,001 | 1,783,039 company | $199,231 | 119 | |
| Payhawk payhawk.com | 2% | 115 | 2,400 | 27 | 5,824 | 21 | ||
| SutiExpense | 2% | |||||||
| Oracle parent site Oracle NetSuite 2% | 2% | 489 | 450,000 | 66,611 | ||||
| Expensify expensify.com | 2% | 241 | 74,000 | 932 | 76,291 | 0 | 1 | |
| Navan navan.com | 0% | 306 | 110,000 | 1,342 | 175,958 | $2,716 | 120 | 8 |
| Coupa coupa.com Coupa Expense Management 0% | 0% | 29 | 60,500 | 1,210 | 41,319 company | $339 | 91 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (brex.com, navan.com, ramp.com, spendesk.com). The first result for “best expense management software” is expensify.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best expense management software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which employee expense reporting tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade expense management tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best expense management software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an expense management software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which expense management tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SAP ConcurSAP ConcurHeldno first choiceSAP Concurno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Emburse, Expensify, Ramp, SAP Concur
Three alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, RampFour alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Navan, RampOne alternative
EmburseGPT-5.4 miniSAP ConcurSAP ConcurHeldagainst: ExpensifySAP ConcurSAP Concuragainst: Brex, EmLedgerno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Expensify, Navan, RampTwo alternatives
Coupa Expense Management, NavanTwo alternatives
Coupa Expense Management, EmburseTwo alternatives
Emburse Nexonia/Emburse Enterprise, RampGemini 3.5 FlashRampSAP ConcurChangedSAP ConcurSAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Brex, Expensify, NetSuite, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Four alternatives
Airwallex Spend, Brex, Navan, SAP ConcurFour alternatives
Brex, Emburse, Navan, RampFive alternatives
Brex, Emburse, Navan, Ramp, RydooThree alternatives
Brex, Payhawk, RampPerplexity SonarSAP Concuragainst: BrexSAP ConcurHeldagainst: BrexNavan, SAP Concuragainst: ExpensifySAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Brex, Expensify, QuickBooks-centric expense tools, Ramp, Zoho Expense
Three alternatives
Emburse, Navan, RampOne alternative
RampThree alternatives
Brex, Ramp, RydooTwo alternatives
Brex, RampGrok 4.1 FastSAP Concuragainst: Expensify, Spendesk, Zoho ExpenseSAP ConcurHeldagainst: BILL Spend, Emburse, Expensify, Rydoono first choiceagainst: Emburse, Zoho ExpenseSAP Concuragainst: Brex, Expensifyno first choiceagainst: Airbase, Brex, Expensify, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Ramp, SAP Concur, Zoho Expense
Three alternatives
Emburse, Navan, Rippling SpendTwo alternatives
Navan, RampFive alternatives
Brex, Emburse, Navan, Ramp, SAP ConcurMistral SmallEmburseagainst: SAP ConcurBILL Spend & ExpenseChangedEmburse, SAP ConcurSAP Concuragainst: Airwallexno first choiceagainst: Brex, SAP Concur
Two alternatives
Airbase, BrexFour alternatives
Airwallex, Expensify, Rydoo, Zoho ExpenseFour alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Ramp, Rippling SpendTwo alternatives
Brex, RampDeepSeek V4 FlashSAP ConcurSAP ConcurHeldagainst: ExpensifyEmburse, SAP ConcurEmburseagainst: SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Expensify, Ramp/Brex, Rippling Financeagainst: ABACUS, BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Chrome River, Emburse, Expensify, FreshBooks, Ramp, SAP Concur, Shoeboxed, Zoho Expense
Four alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Emburse, RampThree alternatives
Emburse, Navan, RampFour alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Expensify, RampLlama 4 MaverickSAP ConcurSAP ConcurHeldSAP ConcurSAP ConcurSAP Concurnothing named
One alternative
BrexOne alternative
ExpensifyTwo alternatives
Rydoo, SpendeskThree alternatives
Airwallex, Emburse, SpendeskFour alternatives
Expensify, Navan, Ramp, Rippling SpendQwen 3.7 FlashSAP ConcurRamp, SAP ConcurChangedagainst: Airbaseno first choiceRampagainst: SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Excel, FreshBooks, QuickBooks Online Expenses, Ramp, Siebel CRM, Submittable, Xero
Four alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Ramp, Rippling SpendTwo alternatives
BILL Spend & Expense, ExpensifyFive alternatives
Airbase, Brexp, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP ConcurOne alternative
AirbaseKimi K2Ramp, SAP ConcurSAP ConcurChangedSAP Concuragainst: ExpensifyPayhawkagainst: Brex, Expensifyno first choiceagainst: Brex, Rippling Spend, SAP Concuragainst: BILL Spend & Expense, Brex, Emburse, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, Rippling Spend, SAP Concur
One alternative
ExpensifyOne alternative
EmburseFour alternatives
Airbase, Brex, Navan, RampFour alternatives
Coupa Expense Management, Ramp, SAP Concur, SutiExpenseFour alternatives
Chrome River, Emburse, Navan, RampGLM 4.7 FlashXSAP ConcurSAP ConcurHeldSAP ConcurRampagainst: SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Chrome River, SAP Concur
Three alternatives
Airwallex, Navan, RampThree alternatives
Brex, Ramp, Rippling SpendSix alternatives
Brex, Coupa Expense Management, Emburse, Navan, Ramp, Rippling FinanceTwo alternatives
Expensify, NavanMiniMax M2.5Oracle NetSuite, SAP ConcurSAP ConcurChangedSAP ConcurBILL Spend & Expense, SutiExpenseagainst: SAP Concurno first choiceagainst: Brex, Ramp
Two alternatives
Emburse, ExpensifyTwo alternatives
Brex, ExpensifySix alternatives
Brex, Emburse, Expensify, Navan, Ramp, Rippling SpendTwo alternatives
Airbase, SpendeskBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Seventy-two rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:30 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 19 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:16 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:57 | yes | 7 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 14 | 262 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:43 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:15 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:37 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:54 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:25 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 19 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:55 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:29 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 23 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 23 | 12 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 23 | 73 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:11 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:33 | yes | 15 | 44 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 14 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 26 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:14 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:49 | yes | 22 | 134 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 22 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 17 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:32 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 9 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:14 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:46 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:29 | no | 0 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:38 | yes | 20 | 56 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:28 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:00 | yes | 16 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:29 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 24 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 24 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:55 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:02 | yes | 18 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 7 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Bill.com read as BILL Spend & Expense
Certify read as Emburse
Coupa read as Coupa Expense Management
Coupa Expense read as Coupa Expense Management
Divvy read as BILL Spend & Expense
Divvy (by United) read as BILL Spend & Expense
Emburse Expense Enterprise read as Emburse
Emburse Expense Enterprise (formerly Chrome River) read as Emburse
QuickBooks Enterprise read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Expense Management (standalone) read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
QuickBooks Online read as QuickBooks Online Expenses
Rippling read as Rippling Spend
Workday Expenses read as Workday
Unresolved, counted raw
Airwallex Spend
Brexp
Coupa Spend Management
EmLedger
Emburse Nexonia/Emburse Enterprise
NetSuite Expense Reports
Oracle Fusion Expenses
QuickBooks-centric expense tools
Siebel CRM
Submittable
Workday Adaptive Expenses
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.