Four categories · what the models named insteadAlternatives to Workiva, as AI models named them
In the October 2026 Edition, 729 of the 1,008 answers collected in the four categories where Workiva holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.
SEC and disclosure reporting
Sixty-five of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in eleven. The first choices in those sixty-five answers, seventeen products in all, the eight most named:
Thirty-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in thirty-five. The first choices in those thirty-eight answers, seven products in all:
Nineteen of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in sixty-three. The first choices in those nineteen answers, one product in all:
The full enterprise standing →ESG and carbon reporting
Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, twenty-three products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in eleven. The first choices in those sixty-nine answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:
Fifty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in twenty-seven. The first choices in those fifty-one answers, seven products in all:
Financial close management
Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, twenty-two products in all, the eight most named:
Seventy-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those seventy-three answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-six of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those sixty-six answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:
Internal controls and SOX
Seventy-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in three. The first choices in those seventy-seven answers, thirty-one products in all, the eight most named:
Sixty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in one. The first choices in those sixty-one answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:
Forty-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name Workiva; it was the first choice in twelve. The first choices in those forty-seven answers, thirteen products in all, the eight most named:
How to read this
A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Workiva neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Workiva only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Workiva's side.
Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Workiva was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.